Swiss Cardiovascular Center Bern, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Cardiovascular Clinic Institute, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 27;11(16):1576-1586. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 May 24.
The study sought to assess whether treatment with ticagrelor, as compared with prasugrel and clopidogrel, improves endothelium-dependent dilation throughout the course of the treatment and other vascular biomarkers, including systemic adenosine plasma levels.
The in vivo off-target effects of ticagrelor in post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients remain poorly characterized.
Fifty-four stable post-ACS patients were sequentially exposed to each of the 3 oral P2Y inhibitors following a 3-period balanced Latin square crossover design with 4 weeks per treatment in 5 European centers. The primary endpoint was the assessment of endothelial function with pulse amplitude tonometry and expressed as reactive hyperemia index at treatment steady state. Secondary endpoints included reactive hyperemia index after loading or before maintenance regimen, systemic adenosine plasma levels, a wide set of vascular biomarkers, and ticagrelor or AR-C124910XX plasma levels throughout each ticagrelor period. In 9 patients, the evaluation of endothelial function was performed simultaneously by pulse amplitude tonometry and flow-mediated dilation.
Reactive hyperemia index did not differ after ticagrelor (1.970 ± 0.535) as compared with prasugrel (2.007 ± 0.640; p = 0.557) or clopidogrel (2.072 ± 0.646; p = 0.685), nor did systemic adenosine plasma levels or vascular biomarkers at any time points. P2Y platelet reactivity units were lower after ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel at all time points and after maintenance dose as compared with prasugrel. Flow-mediated dilation did not differ after the maintenance dose of ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel and prasugrel.
Ticagrelor did not improve endothelial function or increased systemic adenosine plasma levels as compared with prasugrel and clopidogrel in stabilized patients who suffered from an ACS. (Hunting for the Off-Target Properties of Ticagrelor on Endothelial Function in Humans [HI-TECH]; NCT02587260).
本研究旨在评估与普拉格雷和氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛治疗是否能改善治疗过程中的血管内皮依赖性舒张功能和其他血管生物标志物,包括全身腺苷血浆水平。
替格瑞洛在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后患者中的非靶效应的体内特征仍知之甚少。
54 例稳定型 ACS 患者先后接受了 3 种口服 P2Y 抑制剂治疗,采用 3 期平衡拉丁方交叉设计,每个治疗期 4 周,共 5 个欧洲中心参与。主要终点是通过脉搏幅度张力测定法评估内皮功能,并以治疗稳定状态下的反应性充血指数表示。次要终点包括负荷后或维持治疗前的反应性充血指数、全身腺苷血浆水平、广泛的血管生物标志物,以及整个替格瑞洛治疗期间的替格瑞洛或 AR-C124910XX 血浆水平。在 9 例患者中,同时采用脉搏幅度张力测定法和血流介导的扩张法评估内皮功能。
与普拉格雷(2.007 ± 0.640;p = 0.557)或氯吡格雷(2.072 ± 0.646;p = 0.685)相比,替格瑞洛后的反应性充血指数(1.970 ± 0.535)没有差异,且在任何时间点全身腺苷血浆水平或血管生物标志物均无差异。与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛的 P2Y 血小板反应单位在所有时间点均较低,且与普拉格雷相比,在维持剂量时也较低。与氯吡格雷和普拉格雷相比,替格瑞洛维持剂量后的血流介导的扩张无差异。
与普拉格雷和氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛在稳定的 ACS 患者中并未改善内皮功能或增加全身腺苷血浆水平。(HI-TECH:寻找替格瑞洛对人类内皮功能的非靶标特性;NCT02587260)。