• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的P2Y抑制剂单药治疗

P2Y Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

作者信息

Zhou Xuan, Angiolillo Dominick J, Ortega-Paz Luis

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Montgomery, Montgomery, AL 36116, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Oct 6;9(10):340. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9100340.

DOI:10.3390/jcdd9100340
PMID:36286292
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9604207/
Abstract

In patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been the cornerstone of pharmacotherapy for the past two decades. Although its antithrombotic benefit is well established, DAPT is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, which is independently associated with poor prognosis. The improvement of the safety profiles of drug-eluting stents has been critical in investigating and implementing shorter DAPT regimens. The introduction into clinical practice of newer generation oral P2Y inhibitors such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, which provide more potent and predictable platelet inhibition, has questioned the paradigm of standard DAPT durations after coronary stenting. Over the last five years, several trials have assessed the safety and efficacy of P2Y inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT in patients treated with PCI. Moreover, ongoing studies are testing the role of P2Y inhibitor monotherapy immediately after PCI in selected patients. In this review, we provide up-to-date evidence on the efficacy and safety of P2Y inhibitor monotherapy after a short period of DAPT compared to DAPT in patients undergoing PCI as well as outcomes associated with P2Y inhibitor monotherapy compared to aspirin for long-term prevention.

摘要

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性和慢性冠状动脉疾病患者中,双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)在过去二十年一直是药物治疗的基石。尽管其抗血栓形成益处已得到充分证实,但DAPT与出血风险增加相关,而出血又与不良预后独立相关。药物洗脱支架安全性的改善对于研究和实施更短疗程的DAPT方案至关重要。新一代口服P2Y抑制剂如普拉格雷和替格瑞洛引入临床实践,它们能提供更强效和可预测的血小板抑制作用,这对冠状动脉支架置入术后标准DAPT疗程的模式提出了质疑。在过去五年中,多项试验评估了PCI治疗患者在短疗程DAPT后使用P2Y抑制剂单药治疗的安全性和有效性。此外,正在进行的研究正在测试P2Y抑制剂单药治疗在PCI后立即用于特定患者的作用。在本综述中,我们提供了最新证据,对比了PCI患者在短疗程DAPT后使用P2Y抑制剂单药治疗与DAPT的疗效和安全性,以及P2Y抑制剂单药治疗与阿司匹林用于长期预防的相关结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e37/9604207/92dbd3b0c6c0/jcdd-09-00340-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e37/9604207/589bcdc1766b/jcdd-09-00340-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e37/9604207/245d2d8a2f30/jcdd-09-00340-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e37/9604207/92dbd3b0c6c0/jcdd-09-00340-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e37/9604207/589bcdc1766b/jcdd-09-00340-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e37/9604207/245d2d8a2f30/jcdd-09-00340-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e37/9604207/92dbd3b0c6c0/jcdd-09-00340-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
P2Y Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的P2Y抑制剂单药治疗
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Oct 6;9(10):340. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9100340.
2
Aspirin-free antiplatelet strategies after percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无阿司匹林抗血小板策略。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Feb 21;45(8):572-585. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad876.
3
P2Y Inhibitor or Aspirin Following Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗后应用 P2Y 抑制剂或阿司匹林:网状荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov 28;15(22):2239-2249. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.08.009. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
4
Safety and efficacy of antiplatelet regimens after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stents: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)使用药物洗脱支架后抗血小板治疗方案的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 May-Jun;63(3):243-248. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
5
Short dual antiplatelet therapy followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.短期双联抗血小板治疗继以 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后延长双联抗血小板治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jan 21;42(4):308-319. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa739.
6
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pooled Analysis of the SMART-DATE and SMART-CHOICE Trials.P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与急性冠状动脉综合征中常规双联抗血小板治疗或阿司匹林单药治疗的比较:SMART-DATE 和 SMART-CHOICE 试验的汇总分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 1;150:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.03.053. Epub 2021 May 16.
7
De-Escalation Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Prevail over Potent P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergone Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,降阶梯双联抗血小板治疗优于强效P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 25;23(11):360. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2311360. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
P2Y-inhibitor monotherapy after coronary stenting: are all P2Y-inhibitors equal?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后应用 P2Y12 受体抑制剂单药治疗:所有 P2Y12 受体抑制剂都一样吗?
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2022 Aug;20(8):637-645. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2022.2104248. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
9
P2y inhibitor monotherapy after 1-3 months dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.冠状动脉疾病和慢性肾脏病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后1至3个月双联抗血小板治疗后使用P2Y抑制剂单药治疗:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 6;10:1197161. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1197161. eCollection 2023.
10
P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after coronary stenting according to type of P2Y12 inhibitor.根据P2Y12抑制剂类型,冠状动脉支架置入术后的P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗
Heart. 2021 Jun 11;107(13):1077-1083. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318821.

引用本文的文献

1
The Comparative Effectiveness of Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors Versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing PCI: National Registry Data.强效P2Y12抑制剂与氯吡格雷在接受PCI的急性心肌梗死患者中的比较疗效:国家注册数据
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 30;13(21):6536. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216536.
2
New Insights into Antithrombotic Therapy for Cardio- and Cerebrovascular Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Application.心脑血管疾病抗栓治疗的新见解:从分子机制到临床应用
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Jun 14;10(6):258. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10060258.

本文引用的文献

1
Precision medicine in interventional cardiology: implications for antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.介入心脏病学中的精准医学:对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者抗血小板治疗的影响。
Pharmacogenomics. 2022 Aug;23(13):723-737. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2022-0057. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
2
Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From the STOPDAPT-2 Total Cohort.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 1 个月双联抗血小板治疗后氯吡格雷单药治疗:来自 STOPDAPT-2 全队列研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Aug;15(8):e012004. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012004. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
3
Optimal antiplatelet therapy in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention.
接受复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高出血风险患者的最佳抗血小板治疗
Eur Heart J. 2022 Sep 1;43(33):3115-3117. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac369.
4
P2Y inhibitor monotherapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中 P2Y 抑制剂单药治疗。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022 Dec;19(12):829-844. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00725-6. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
5
Ten-year patterns of stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention with new- versus early-generation drug-eluting stents: insights from the DECADE cooperation.新型与早期一代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 10 年支架血栓形成的模式:来自 DECADE 合作的观察。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022 Nov;75(11):894-902. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
6
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的抗血小板治疗。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Apr 1;17(17):e1371-e1396. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904.
7
Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin in Chinese Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A TWILIGHT China Substudy.替格瑞洛联合或不联合阿司匹林用于中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者:TWILIGHT China 亚组研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Apr;15(4):e009495. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009495. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
8
Ticagrelor monotherapy versus aspirin monotherapy at 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention: a landmark analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 12 个月的影响:GLOBAL LEADERS 试验的里程碑分析。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Aug 5;18(5):e377-e388. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00870.
9
Comparison of Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1 to 2 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The STOPDAPT-2 ACS Randomized Clinical Trial.急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗 1 至 2 个月后氯吡格雷单药治疗与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗的比较:STOPDAPT-2 ACS 随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Apr 1;7(4):407-417. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.5244.
10
Short Duration of DAPT Versus De-Escalation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后短期 DAPT 与降级治疗
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb 14;15(3):268-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.11.028.