Second Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 2 Jakubowskiego Street, 30-688, Cracow, Poland.
Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, 2 Jakubowskiego Street, 30-688, Cracow, Poland.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Nov 17;21(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01685-4.
Pleiotropic effects have been implicated in clinical benefits of ticagrelor compared to thienopyridine P2Y antagonists. There are conflicting data regarding effects of ticagrelor vs. thienopyridine P2Y blockers on endothelial function. Our aim was to compare endothelial biomarkers and their relations with platelet reactivity in real-world patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) on maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor or clopidogrel stratified by diabetes status.
Biochemical indices of endothelial dysfunction/activation and platelet reactivity by multiple electrode aggregometry were compared in 126 stable post-ACS subjects (mean age: 65 ± 10 years, 92 men and 34 women), including patients with (n = 61) or without (n = 65) coexistent type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on uneventful maintenance DAPT with either ticagrelor (90 mg b.d.) or clopidogrel (75 mg o.d.) in addition to low-dose aspirin. Exclusion criteria included a complicated in-hospital course, symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% and relevant coexistent diseases except for well-controlled diabetes, mild renal insufficiency or hypertension.
Clinical characteristics were similar in patients on ticagrelor (n = 62) and clopidogrel (n = 64). The adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation and circulating soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) were decreased in ticagrelor users irrespective of T2DM status (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01 for platelet reactivity and sP-selectin, respectively). Plasma levels of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) were lower in T2DM subjects on ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel (758 ± 162 vs. 913 ± 217 µg/L, p < 0.01). In contrast, plasma sVCAM-1 was similar in non-diabetic patients on ticagrelor and clopidogrel (872 ± 203 vs. 821 ± 210 µg/L, p > 0.7). The concentrations of sE-selectin, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and asymmetric dimethylarginine did not differ according to the type of P2Y antagonist regardless of T2DM status. Platelet reactivity was unrelated to any endothelial biomarker in subjects with or without T2DM.
Our preliminary findings may suggest an association of ticagrelor-based maintenance DAPT with favorable endothelial effects compared to clopidogrel users in stable post-ACS patients with T2DM. If proven, this could contribute to more pronounced clinical benefits of ticagrelor in diabetic subjects.
与噻吩吡啶 P2Y 拮抗剂相比,替格瑞洛的多种作用可能与临床获益相关。关于替格瑞洛与噻吩吡啶 P2Y 阻滞剂对内皮功能的影响,存在相互矛盾的数据。我们的目的是比较急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后稳定期患者在维持双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)中使用替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷时,根据糖尿病状态分层的内皮生物标志物及其与血小板反应性的关系。
126 例稳定型 ACS 患者(平均年龄 65±10 岁,92 名男性和 34 名女性),包括无(n=65)或有(n=61)共存 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者,接受替格瑞洛(90mg,每日 2 次)或氯吡格雷(75mg,每日 1 次)加低剂量阿司匹林的无并发症维持 DAPT。排除标准包括住院期间发生复杂情况、有症状的心衰、左心室射血分数<40%以及除控制良好的糖尿病、轻度肾功能不全或高血压以外的相关共存疾病。
使用替格瑞洛(n=62)和氯吡格雷(n=64)的患者临床特征相似。替格瑞洛使用者的二磷酸腺苷诱导的血小板聚集和循环可溶性 P-选择素(sP-选择素)均降低,无论 T2DM 状态如何(血小板反应性和 sP-选择素分别为 p<0.001 和 p<0.01)。替格瑞洛治疗的 T2DM 患者的可溶性血管细胞黏附分子-1(sVCAM-1)水平低于氯吡格雷治疗的患者(758±162 vs. 913±217µg/L,p<0.01)。相比之下,无糖尿病患者使用替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷的 sVCAM-1 水平相似(872±203 vs. 821±210µg/L,p>0.7)。无论 T2DM 状态如何,sE-选择素、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1 和不对称二甲基精氨酸的浓度均不随 P2Y 拮抗剂的类型而变化。无论患者是否患有 T2DM,血小板反应性均与任何内皮生物标志物无关。
我们的初步研究结果可能表明,与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛基础的维持性 DAPT 与稳定期 ACS 合并 T2DM 患者的有利内皮作用相关。如果得到证实,这可能会导致替格瑞洛在糖尿病患者中的临床获益更加显著。