Aerts Diederik, Arguëlles Jonito Aerts, Beltran Lester, Geriente Suzette, Sassoli de Bianchi Massimiliano, Sozzo Sandro, Veloz Tomas
1Center Leo Apostel for Interdisciplinary Studies, Brussels Free University, Krijgskundestraat 33, 1160 Brussels, Belgium.
KASK and Conservatory, Jozef Kluyskensstraat 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Found Sci. 2018;23(2):323-335. doi: 10.1007/s10699-017-9528-9. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
We present a cognitive psychology experiment where participants were asked to select pairs of spatial directions that they considered to be the best example of . Data are shown to violate the CHSH version of Bell's inequality with the same magnitude as in typical Bell-test experiments with entangled spins. Wind directions thus appear to be conceptual entities connected through meaning, in human cognition, in a similar way as spins appear to be entangled in experiments conducted in physics laboratories. This is the first part of a two-part article. In the second part (Aerts et al. in Found Sci, 2017) we present a symmetrized version of the same experiment for which we provide a quantum modeling of the collected data in Hilbert space.
我们展示了一个认知心理学实验,在该实验中,参与者被要求选择他们认为是最佳示例的空间方向对。结果表明,数据违反了贝尔不等式的CHSH版本,其程度与典型的纠缠自旋贝尔测试实验相同。因此,在人类认知中,风向似乎是通过意义连接起来的概念实体,其方式类似于在物理实验室进行的实验中自旋似乎相互纠缠的方式。这是一篇分两部分的文章的第一部分。在第二部分(Aerts等人,《发现科学》,2017年)中,我们展示了同一实验的对称版本,并为其在希尔伯特空间中收集的数据提供了量子建模。