Slater Cindy, De La Mare Jo-Anne, Edkins Adrienne Lesley
The Biomedical Biotechnology Research Unit, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa.
Oncol Lett. 2018 Jun;15(6):8516-8526. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8431. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
The cancer stem cell (CSC) theory implicates a small subpopulation of cells with stem-like properties, which is responsible for tumour initiation, development and metastasis. The unique biological and functional characteristics of CSCs, widely associated with treatment resistance, indicate an association between metastasis and stemness. It was hypothesised that metastatic cell lines may be enriched in CSCs and that this would correlate with a more resistant tumour. In the present study, the SW480 and SW620 paired cell lines derived from a colon adenocarcinoma and its lymph node metastasis, respectively were compared as an model of cancer progression. Their chemosensitivity and CSC properties were investigated. A range of assays were performed, including the side population assay, ALDEFLUOR assay, tumoursphere assay and assessment of CSC-associated surface phenotypes. It was determined that the SW480 and SW620 cells exhibited similar growth rates, although the SW480 cells were more migratory in wound healing assays on collagen and fibronectin matrices. SW480 and SW620 cells displayed similar CSC profiles, however, SW480 cells demosntrated significantly greater tumoursphere forming efficiency over SW620 cells. Tumourspheres derived from SW480 and SW620 cells also displayed differential sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, geldanamycin and novobiocin that was not apparent when cells were grown under adherent conditions. Taken together, these results suggest that although the two cell lines have similar levels of putative CSC populations, there are differences in their biology that cannot be explained by these CSC levels. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to conduct a detailed analysis of the CSC populations using multiple assays in a paired cell line model. These results have clinical relevance for the understanding of the differences between primary tumours and their metastatic counterparts.
癌症干细胞(CSC)理论认为,具有干细胞样特性的一小部分细胞亚群负责肿瘤的起始、发展和转移。CSC独特的生物学和功能特性与治疗抗性广泛相关,这表明转移与干性之间存在关联。有假设认为,转移性细胞系中可能富含CSC,且这与更具抗性的肿瘤相关。在本研究中,分别源自结肠腺癌及其淋巴结转移灶的SW480和SW620配对细胞系作为癌症进展模型进行了比较。研究了它们的化学敏感性和CSC特性。进行了一系列检测,包括侧群分析、醛脱氢酶分析、肿瘤球分析以及对CSC相关表面表型的评估。结果确定,SW480和SW620细胞的生长速率相似,尽管在胶原蛋白和纤连蛋白基质上进行的伤口愈合试验中,SW480细胞的迁移能力更强。SW480和SW620细胞显示出相似的CSC特征,然而,SW480细胞形成肿瘤球的效率明显高于SW620细胞。源自SW480和SW620细胞的肿瘤球对5-氟尿嘧啶、奥沙利铂、格尔德霉素和新生霉素也表现出不同的敏感性,而在贴壁条件下培养细胞时这种差异并不明显。综上所述,这些结果表明,尽管这两种细胞系中假定的CSC群体水平相似,但它们的生物学特性存在差异,而这些差异无法用这些CSC水平来解释。据我们所知,这是第一项在配对细胞系模型中使用多种检测方法对CSC群体进行详细分析的研究。这些结果对于理解原发性肿瘤与其转移灶之间的差异具有临床意义。