Department of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Wohlenstrasse 50a, CH-3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland.
Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC Groningen, Netherlands.
Sci Adv. 2018 May 23;4(5):eaap8563. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aap8563. eCollection 2018 May.
Males pursuing alternative reproductive tactics have been predicted to face a trade-off between maximizing either swimming performance or endurance of their sperm. However, empirical evidence for this trade-off is equivocal, which may be due to simplistic assumptions. In the shell-brooding cichlid fish , two Mendelian male morphs compete for fertilization by divergent means: Bourgeois nest males ejaculate sperm, on average, about six times farther from the unfertilized ova than do parasitic dwarf males. This asymmetry is opposite to the usual situation, in which bourgeois males typically benefit from superior fertilization opportunities, suggesting that nest males' sperm should persist longer than dwarf male sperm. The assumed trade-off between sperm swimming performance and longevity predicts that, in turn, sperm of dwarf males should outperform that of nest males in swimming efficiency. Measurement of sperm performance and endurance reveals that dwarf male spermatozoa swim straighter initially than those of nest males, but their motility declines earlier and their velocity slows down more abruptly. Nest male sperm survives longer, which relates to a larger sperm head plus midpiece, implying more mitochondria. Thus, the trade-off between sperm performance and endurance is optimized in opposite directions by alternative male morphs. We argue that the relative success of alternative sperm performance strategies can be influenced strongly by environmental factors such as the time window between gamete release and fertilization, and the position of gamete release. This is an important yet little understood aspect of gametic adaptations to sperm competition.
雄性动物在追求替代生殖策略时,被预测会在最大限度地提高精子的游泳性能或耐力之间面临权衡。然而,这种权衡的经验证据是模棱两可的,这可能是由于过于简单的假设。在贝壳孵化的慈鲷鱼中,两种孟德尔雄性形态通过不同的方式争夺受精机会:资产阶级巢居雄性平均比寄生的矮小雄性将精子射出得更远,大约六倍远。这种不对称与通常的情况相反,在通常情况下,资产阶级雄性通常从优越的受精机会中受益,这表明巢居雄性的精子应该比矮小雄性的精子持续时间更长。假设的精子游泳性能和寿命之间的权衡表明,反过来,矮小雄性的精子在游泳效率上应该优于巢居雄性的精子。对精子性能和耐力的测量表明,矮小雄性的精子最初比巢居雄性的精子游得更直,但它们的活力更早下降,速度更突然放缓。巢居雄性的精子存活时间更长,这与更大的精子头部和中段有关,意味着更多的线粒体。因此,替代雄性形态在相反的方向上优化了精子性能和耐力之间的权衡。我们认为,替代精子性能策略的相对成功可以受到环境因素的强烈影响,例如配子释放和受精之间的时间窗口,以及配子释放的位置。这是配子对精子竞争适应的一个重要但尚未被充分理解的方面。