Ohl Michael E, Carrell Margaret, Thurman Andrew, Weg Mark Vander, Hudson Teresa, Mengeling Michelle, Vaughan-Sarrazin Mary
VA Office of Rural Health (ORH), Veterans Rural Health Resource Center- Iowa City, Iowa City VA Medical Center, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Mailstop 152, Iowa City VAMC, 52246m, Iowa City, IA, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 29;18(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3108-8.
Military Veterans in the United States are more likely than the general population to live in rural areas, and often have limited geographic access to Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. In an effort to improve access for Veterans living far from VHA facilities, the recently-enacted Veterans Choice Act directed VHA to purchase care from non-VHA providers for Veterans who live more than 40 miles from the nearest VHA facility. To explore potential impacts of these reforms on Veterans and healthcare providers, we identified VHA-users who were eligible for purchased care based on distance to VHA facilities, and quantified the availability of various types of non-VHA healthcare providers in counties where these Veterans lived.
We combined 2013 administrative data on VHA-users with county-level data on rurality, non-VHA provider availability, population, household income, and population health status.
Most (77.9%) of the 416,338 VHA-users who were eligible for purchased care based on distance lived in rural counties. Approximately 16% of these Veterans lived in primary care shortage areas, while the majority (70.2%) lived in mental health care shortage areas. Most lived in counties that lacked specialized health care providers (e.g. cardiologists, pulmonologists, and neurologists). Counterintuitively, VHA played a greater role in delivering healthcare for the overall adult population in counties that were farther from VHA facilities (30.7 VHA-users / 1000 adults in counties over 40 miles from VHA facilities, vs. 22.4 VHA-users / 1000 adults in counties within 20 miles of VHA facilities, p < 0.01).
Initiatives to purchase care for Veterans living more than 40 miles from VHA facilities may not significantly improve their access to care, as these areas are underserved by non-VHA providers. Non-VHA providers in the predominantly rural areas more than 40 miles from VHA facilities may be asked to assume care for relatively large numbers of Veterans, because VHA has recently cared for a greater proportion of the population in these areas, and these Veterans are now eligible for purchased care.
美国退伍军人比普通人群更有可能居住在农村地区,而且他们在地理上获得退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)设施服务的机会往往有限。为了改善居住在远离VHA设施地区的退伍军人获得医疗服务的机会,最近颁布的《退伍军人选择法案》指示VHA为居住在距离最近的VHA设施超过40英里的退伍军人从非VHA提供者处购买医疗服务。为了探讨这些改革对退伍军人和医疗服务提供者的潜在影响,我们根据与VHA设施的距离确定了有资格获得购买医疗服务的VHA用户,并对这些退伍军人居住县内各类非VHA医疗服务提供者的可及性进行了量化。
我们将2013年VHA用户的管理数据与县级农村地区、非VHA提供者可及性、人口、家庭收入和人口健康状况数据相结合。
在416338名因距离而有资格获得购买医疗服务的VHA用户中,大多数(77.9%)居住在农村县。这些退伍军人中约16%生活在初级保健短缺地区,而大多数(70.2%)生活在精神卫生保健短缺地区。大多数人居住的县缺乏专科医疗服务提供者(如心脏病专家、肺病专家和神经科医生)。与直觉相反的是,在距离VHA设施较远的县,VHA在为全体成年人口提供医疗服务方面发挥了更大的作用(距离VHA设施超过40英里的县每1000名成年人中有30.7名VHA用户,而距离VHA设施20英里以内的县每1000名成年人中有22.4名VHA用户,p<0.01)。
为居住在距离VHA设施超过40英里的退伍军人购买医疗服务的举措可能无法显著改善他们获得医疗服务的机会,因为这些地区非VHA提供者的服务不足。距离VHA设施超过40英里的主要农村地区的非VHA提供者可能会被要求为数量相对较多的退伍军人提供医疗服务,因为VHA最近在这些地区照顾的人口比例更大,而且这些退伍军人现在有资格获得购买的医疗服务。