Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.R.M.).
St. Vincent Heart Center, Indianapolis, IN (C.S.).
Circulation. 2018 Oct 30;138(18):1923-1934. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035722.
The MOMENTUM 3 trial compares the centrifugal HeartMate 3 (HM3) with the axial HeartMate II (HMII) continuous-flow left ventricular assist system in patients with advanced heart failure, irrespective of the intended goal of therapy. The trial's 2-year clinical outcome (n=366) demonstrated superiority of the HM3 for the primary end point (survival free of a disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning pump). This analysis evaluates health resource use and cost implications of the observed differences between the 2 devices while patients were enrolled in the trial.
We analyzed all hospitalizations and their associated costs occurring after discharge from the implant hospitalization until censoring (study withdrawal, heart transplantation, and pump exchange with a nonstudy device or death). Each adjudicated episode of hospital-based care was used to calculate costs (device-attributable and non-device-attributable event costs), estimated by using trial data and payer administrative claims databases. Cost savings stratified by subgroups (study outcome [transplant, death, or ongoing on device], intended goal of therapy, type of insurance, or sex) were also assessed.
In 366 randomly assigned patients, 361 comprised the as-treated group (189 in the HM3 group and 172 in the HMII group), of whom 337 (177 in the HM3 group and 160 in the HMII group) were successfully discharged following implantation. The HM3 arm experienced fewer total hospitalizations per patient-year (HM3: 2.1±0.2 versus HMII: 2.7±0.2; P=0.015) and 8.3 fewer hospital days per patient-year on average (HM3: 17.1 days versus HMII: 25.5 days; P=0.003). These differences were driven by patients hospitalized for suspected pump thrombosis (HM3: 0.6% versus HMII: 12.5%; P<0.001) and stroke (HM3: 2.8% versus HMII: 11.3%; P=0.002). Controlled for time spent in the study (average cumulative cost per patient-year), postdischarge HM3 arm costs were 51% lower than with the HMII (HM3: $37 685±4251 versus HMII: $76 599±11 889, P<0.001) and similar in either bridge to transplant or destination therapy intent.
In this 2-year outcome economic analysis of the MOMENTUM 3 trial, the HM3 demonstrated a reduction in rehospitalizations, hospital days spent during rehospitalizations, and a significant cost savings following discharge in comparison with the HMII left ventricular assist system, irrespective of the intended goal of therapy.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02224755.
MOMENTUM 3 试验比较了离心式 HeartMate 3(HM3)与轴流式 HeartMate II(HMII)连续血流左心室辅助系统在晚期心力衰竭患者中的应用,无论治疗的预期目标如何。该试验的 2 年临床结果(n=366)显示 HM3 在主要终点(无致残性中风或更换或移除故障泵的再手术的存活)方面具有优越性。本分析评估了在试验过程中,两种设备之间观察到的差异对健康资源利用和成本的影响。
我们分析了从植入术后出院到截止日期(研究退出、心脏移植和用非研究设备或死亡更换泵)期间发生的所有住院治疗及其相关费用。每个经裁决的住院治疗事件都用于计算成本(设备相关和非设备相关事件成本),这些成本是使用试验数据和支付者行政索赔数据库估计的。还按亚组(研究结果[移植、死亡或继续使用设备]、治疗目的、保险类型或性别)评估了成本节省情况。
在 366 名随机分配的患者中,361 名患者为按治疗分配组(HM3 组 189 例,HMII 组 172 例),其中 337 名(HM3 组 177 例,HMII 组 160 例)成功植入后出院。HM3 组的每位患者每年的总住院次数(HM3:2.1±0.2 次,HMII:2.7±0.2 次;P=0.015)和平均每年的住院天数(HM3:17.1 天,HMII:25.5 天;P=0.003)减少。这些差异是由疑似泵血栓形成(HM3:0.6%,HMII:12.5%;P<0.001)和中风(HM3:2.8%,HMII:11.3%;P=0.002)住院的患者驱动的。考虑到在研究期间花费的时间(每位患者每年的平均累积成本),HM3 组出院后的成本比 HMII 组低 51%(HM3:37685±4251 美元,HMII:76599±11889 美元,P<0.001),并且在桥接移植或目标治疗的意图方面,两种治疗方法的成本相似。
在 MOMENTUM 3 试验的 2 年结果经济学分析中,与 HMII 左心室辅助系统相比,HM3 在出院后显示出再住院次数减少、再住院期间住院天数减少和显著的成本节省,无论治疗的预期目标如何。
网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov 。唯一标识符:NCT02224755。