Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;23(8):1392-1400. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2211. Epub 2021 May 18.
The MOMENTUM 3 pivotal trial established superiority of the HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD), a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow pump, over the HeartMate II axial-flow pump. We now evaluate HM3 LVAD outcomes in a single-arm prospective continuous access protocol (CAP) post-pivotal trial study.
We enrolled 2200 HM3 implanted patients (515 pivotal trial and 1685 CAP patients) and compared outcomes including survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device (primary composite endpoint), overall survival and major adverse events at 2 years. The 2-year primary endpoint [76.7% vs. 74.8%; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.08, P = 0.21] and overall survival (81.2% vs. 79.0%) were similar among CAP and pivotal cohorts despite sicker patients (more intra-aortic balloon pump use and INTERMACS profile 1) in CAP who were more often intended for destination therapy. Survival was similar between the CAP and pivotal trial in transplant ineligible patients (79.1% vs. 76.7%; adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.68-1.16, P = 0.38). In a pooled analysis, the 2-year primary endpoint was similar between INTERMACS profiles 1-2 ('unstable' advanced heart failure), profile 3 ('stable' on inotropic therapy), and profiles 4-7 ('stable' ambulatory advanced heart failure) (75.7% vs. 77.6% vs. 72.9%, respectively). The net burden of adverse events was lower in CAP (adjusted rate ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.98, P = 0.006), with consequent decrease in hospitalization.
The primary results of accumulating HM3 LVAD experience suggest a lower adverse event burden and similar survival compared to the pivotal MOMENTUM 3 trial.
MOMENTUM 3 关键性试验确立了 HeartMate 3(HM3)左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的优越性,该装置是一种完全磁悬浮离心泵,优于 HeartMate II 轴流泵。我们现在在一项关键性试验后的单臂前瞻性连续准入方案(CAP)中评估 HM3 LVAD 的结果。
我们纳入了 2200 例 HM3 植入患者(515 例关键性试验和 1685 例 CAP 患者),并比较了包括无残疾性中风或再手术以更换或移除故障设备的生存(主要复合终点)、总生存和 2 年时的主要不良事件。尽管 CAP 队列中的患者病情更重(更多使用主动脉内球囊泵和 INTERMACS 分级 1),且更倾向于采用心脏移植的终末期治疗,但 CAP 和关键性试验队列中的 2 年主要终点[76.7% vs. 74.8%;调整后的风险比(HR)0.87,95%置信区间(CI)0.71-1.08,P=0.21]和总生存率(81.2% vs. 79.0%)相似。在不适合移植的患者中,CAP 和关键性试验的生存情况相似(79.1% vs. 76.7%;调整后的 HR 0.89,95%CI 0.68-1.16,P=0.38)。在一项汇总分析中,INTERMACS 分级 1-2(“不稳定”晚期心力衰竭)、分级 3(“稳定”在正性肌力治疗下)和分级 4-7(“稳定”的门诊晚期心力衰竭)之间的 2 年主要终点相似(分别为 75.7%、77.6%和 72.9%)。CAP 的不良事件总负担较低(调整后的率比 0.93,95%CI 0.88-0.98,P=0.006),从而导致住院率降低。
HM3 LVAD 经验的主要结果表明,与关键性 MOMENTUM 3 试验相比,不良事件负担较低,生存率相似。