1 School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia , Bandar Sunway, Malaysia .
2 Asian Centre for Evidence Synthesis in Population, Implementation and Clinical Outcomes (PICO), Health and Well-being Cluster, Global Asia in the 21st Century (GA21) Platform, Monash University Malaysia , Bandar Sunway, Malaysia .
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jul;20(7):492-500. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0098. Epub 2018 May 29.
Telemedicine has been utilized increasingly worldwide for diabetes management, due to its potential to improve healthcare access and clinical outcomes. Few studies have assessed the economic benefits of telemedicine, which may contribute to underfunding in potentially important programs. We aim to systematically review the literature on economic evaluations of telemedicine in diabetes care, assess the quality, and summarize the evidence on driver of cost-effectiveness.
A literature search was performed in 10 databases from inception until February 2018. All economic evaluations assessing the economic evaluation of telemedicine in diabetes were eligible for inclusion. We subsequently evaluated the study quality in terms of effectiveness measures, cost measure, economic model, as well as time horizon.
Of the 1877 studies identified, 14 articles were included in our final review. The healthcare providers' fees are a major predictor for total cost. In particular, the use of telemedicine for retinal screening was beneficial and cost-effective for diabetes management, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between $113.48/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and $3,328.46/QALY (adjusted to 2017 inflation rate). Similarly, the use of telemonitoring and telephone reminders was cost-effective in diabetes management.
Among all telemedicine strategies examined, teleophthalmology was the most cost-effective intervention. Future research is needed to provide evidence on the long-term experience of telemedicine and facilitate resource allocation.
由于远程医疗具有改善医疗保健可及性和临床结果的潜力,因此在全球范围内越来越多地用于糖尿病管理。很少有研究评估远程医疗的经济效益,这可能导致潜在重要计划的资金不足。我们旨在系统地回顾有关远程医疗在糖尿病护理中的经济评估的文献,评估质量,并总结成本效益的驱动因素的证据。
从开始到 2018 年 2 月,在 10 个数据库中进行了文献检索。所有评估远程医疗在糖尿病中经济评估的经济评估都有资格入选。随后,我们从有效性措施,成本措施,经济模型以及时间范围等方面评估了研究质量。
在确定的 1877 项研究中,有 14 项研究被纳入最终审查。医疗保健提供者的费用是总费用的主要预测因素。特别是,远程医疗用于视网膜筛查对糖尿病管理是有益且具有成本效益的,增量成本效益比在 113.48 美元/质量调整生命年(QALY)和 3328.46 美元/QALY 之间(调整至 2017 年通胀率)。同样,远程监测和电话提醒在糖尿病管理中具有成本效益。
在所检查的所有远程医疗策略中,远程眼科学是最具成本效益的干预措施。需要进一步的研究来提供远程医疗的长期经验证据,并促进资源分配。