Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
Neoplasia. 2018 Jul;20(7):678-686. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 26.
The coexpression of pIGF-1R and MMP-7 (double-positive phenotype, DP) correlates with poor overall survival (OS) in KRAS wild-type (WT) (exon 2) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with irinotecan-cetuximab in second/third line.
We analyzed two prospective biomarker design trials of newly diagnosed RAS-WT mCRC patients treated with panitumumab-FOLFOX6 (PULSE trial; NCT01288339) or cetuximab plus either FOLFOX6/FOLFIRI (POSIBA trial; NCT01276379). The main exposure was DP phenotype (DP/non-DP), as assessed by two independent pathologists. DP cases were defined by immunohistochemistry as >70% expression of moderate or strong intensity for both MMP-7 and pIGF-1R. Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints: OS and response rate. PFS and OS were adjusted by baseline characteristics using multivariate Cox models.
We analyzed 67 patients (30 non-DP, 37 DP) in the PULSE trial and 181 patients in the POSIBA trial (158 non-DP, 23 DP). Response rates and PFS were similar between groups in both studies. DP was associated with prolonged OS in PULSE (adjusted HR: 0.23; 95%CI: 0.11-0.52; P=.0004) and with shorter OS in POSIBA (adjusted HR: 1.67; 95%CI: 0.96-2.90; P=.07).
A differential effect of anti-EGFRs on survival by DP phenotype was observed. Panitumumab might be more beneficial for RAS-WT mCRC patients with DP phenotype, whereas cetuximab might improve OS in non-DP.
在接受伊立替康-西妥昔单抗二线/三线治疗的 KRAS 野生型(exon 2)转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中,pIGF-1R 和 MMP-7 的共表达(双阳性表型,DP)与总生存期(OS)不良相关。
我们分析了两项新诊断的 RAS 野生型 mCRC 患者接受帕尼单抗- FOLFOX6(PULSE 试验;NCT01288339)或西妥昔单抗联合 FOLFOX6/FOLFIRI(POSIBA 试验;NCT01276379)治疗的前瞻性生物标志物设计试验。主要暴露因素为 DP 表型(DP/非-DP),由两位独立病理学家评估。DP 病例通过免疫组化法定义为 MMP-7 和 pIGF-1R 的中强表达均>70%。主要终点:无进展生存期(PFS);次要终点:OS 和反应率。使用多变量 Cox 模型根据基线特征调整 PFS 和 OS。
我们分析了 PULSE 试验中的 67 例患者(30 例非-DP,37 例 DP)和 POSIBA 试验中的 181 例患者(158 例非-DP,23 例 DP)。在两项研究中,两组的反应率和 PFS 相似。DP 与 PULSE 中的 OS 延长相关(调整后的 HR:0.23;95%CI:0.11-0.52;P=.0004),与 POSIBA 中的 OS 缩短相关(调整后的 HR:1.67;95%CI:0.96-2.90;P=.07)。
DP 表型对 EGFR 抑制剂的生存影响存在差异。帕尼单抗可能对 DP 表型的 RAS 野生型 mCRC 患者更有益,而西妥昔单抗可能改善非 DP 患者的 OS。