• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让患者及其家属参与精神卫生保健中自杀、自杀未遂和其他警戒事件的分析:荷兰的一项定性研究。

Involving Patients and Families in the Analysis of Suicides, Suicide Attempts, and Other Sentinel Events in Mental Healthcare: A Qualitative Study in The Netherlands.

机构信息

NIVEL, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 29;15(6):1104. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061104.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15061104
PMID:29843464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6025554/
Abstract

Involving patients and families in mental healthcare is becoming more commonplace, but little is known about how they are involved in the aftermath of serious adverse events related to quality of care (sentinel events, including suicides). This study explores the role patients and families have in formal processes after sentinel events in Dutch mental healthcare. We analyzed the existing policies of 15 healthcare organizations and spoke with 35 stakeholders including patients, families, their counselors, the national regulator, and professionals. Respondents argue that involving patients and families is valuable to help deal with the event emotionally, provide additional information, and prevent escalation. Results indicate that involving patients and families is only described in sentinel event policies to a limited extent. In practice, involvement consists mostly of providing aftercare and sharing information about the event by providers. Complexities such as privacy concerns and involuntary admissions are said to hinder involvement. Respondents also emphasize that involvement should not be obligatory and stress the need for patients and families to be involved throughout the process of treatment. There is no one-size-fits-all strategy for involving patients and families after sentinel events. The first step seems to be early involvement during treatment process itself.

摘要

让患者和家属参与精神卫生保健变得越来越普遍,但对于他们在与医疗质量相关的严重不良事件(警戒事件,包括自杀)发生后的参与程度,人们知之甚少。本研究探讨了患者和家属在荷兰精神卫生保健中警戒事件后的正式流程中所扮演的角色。我们分析了 15 家医疗机构的现有政策,并与包括患者、家属、他们的顾问、国家监管机构和专业人员在内的 35 名利益相关者进行了交谈。受访者认为,让患者和家属参与进来,有助于在情感上处理事件,提供额外的信息,并防止事件升级。研究结果表明,在警戒事件政策中,仅有限地描述了让患者和家属参与进来。在实践中,参与主要包括由提供者提供善后护理和分享有关事件的信息。一些复杂因素,如隐私问题和非自愿入院,被认为会阻碍参与。受访者还强调,参与不应该是强制性的,并强调需要让患者和家属在整个治疗过程中参与进来。对于警戒事件发生后如何让患者和家属参与进来,没有一种放之四海而皆准的策略。第一步似乎是在治疗过程中尽早让他们参与进来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d15/6025554/24fb0c488184/ijerph-15-01104-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d15/6025554/24fb0c488184/ijerph-15-01104-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d15/6025554/24fb0c488184/ijerph-15-01104-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Involving Patients and Families in the Analysis of Suicides, Suicide Attempts, and Other Sentinel Events in Mental Healthcare: A Qualitative Study in The Netherlands.让患者及其家属参与精神卫生保健中自杀、自杀未遂和其他警戒事件的分析:荷兰的一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 29;15(6):1104. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061104.
2
Interventions to increase patient and family involvement in escalation of care for acute life-threatening illness in community health and hospital settings.增加患者和家属参与社区卫生和医院环境中急性危及生命疾病治疗升级的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):CD012829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012829.pub2.
3
Feasibility and impact of data-driven learning within the suicide prevention action network of thirteen specialist mental healthcare institutions (SUPRANET Care) in the Netherlands: a study protocol.荷兰13家专业精神卫生保健机构自杀预防行动网络(SUPRANET Care)内数据驱动学习的可行性与影响:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):e024398. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024398.
4
Exploring the experiences of bereaved families involved in assisted suicide in Southern Switzerland: a qualitative study.探索瑞士南部参与协助自杀的丧亲家庭的经历:一项定性研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Jun;5(2):146-52. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000483. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
5
Suicide and attempted suicide in general practice, 1979-1986.1979 - 1986年全科医疗中的自杀与自杀未遂情况
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1989 Mar;79(3):268-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1989.tb10257.x.
6
The experiences of attempt survivor families and how they cope after a suicide attempt in Ghana: a qualitative study.加纳自杀未遂幸存者家庭的经历以及他们在自杀未遂后的应对方式:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 11;17(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1336-9.
7
Experiences of suicide bereavement: a qualitative study exploring the role of the GP.自杀丧亲之痛的经历:一项探索全科医生角色的定性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Feb;66(643):e92-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X683413.
8
What are the physical and psychological health effects of suicide bereavement on family members? An observational and interview mixed-methods study in Ireland.自杀丧亲之痛对家庭成员的身心健康有何影响?爱尔兰的一项观察与访谈相结合的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 13;8(1):e019472. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019472.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
The epidemiology of suicide and attempted suicide in Dutch General Practice 1983-2003.1983 - 2003年荷兰全科医疗中自杀与自杀未遂的流行病学情况
BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Nov 4;6:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-45.

引用本文的文献

1
Involving Service Users in Care Regulation: A Scoping Review of Empirical Literature.让服务使用者参与护理监管:实证文献的范围综述
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8509. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8509. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
2
Patient perspectives on adverse event investigations in health care.患者对医疗保健中不良事件调查的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 10;24(1):1044. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11522-x.
3
The process and perspective of serious incident investigations in adult community mental health services: integrative review and synthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and family engagement in incident investigations: exploring hospital manager and incident investigators' experiences and challenges.患者及其家属参与事件调查:探索医院管理者和事件调查员的经验和挑战。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Oct;23(4):252-261. doi: 10.1177/1355819618788586. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
2
What can we learn from patients' perspectives on the quality and safety of hospital care?从患者的角度来看,我们能从医院护理的质量和安全性中学到什么?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Sep;27(9):671-672. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008106. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
3
Inspectors' responses to adolescents' assessment of quality of care: a case study on involving adolescents in inspections.
成人社区心理健康服务中严重事件调查的过程与视角:综合综述与分析
BJPsych Bull. 2024 Jan 4;49(1):1-13. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2023.98.
4
Patient, carer and family experiences of seeking redress and reconciliation following a life-changing event: Systematic review of qualitative evidence.患者、照顾者和家属在经历改变生活的事件后寻求赔偿和和解的体验:系统评价定性证据。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2127-2150. doi: 10.1111/hex.13820. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
5
Role of the regulator in enabling a just culture: a qualitative study in mental health and hospital care.监管者在建立公正文化中的作用:一项心理健康和医院护理领域的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 27;12(7):e061321. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061321.
6
Adverse event reviews in healthcare: what matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family.医疗保健中的不良事件审查:患者及其家属关心什么?一项探索患者和家属观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 9;12(5):e060158. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060158.
7
Coexisting service-related factors preceding suicide: a network analysis.共存的与服务相关的自杀前因素:网络分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 21;12(4):e050953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050953.
8
What methods are used to promote patient and family involvement in healthcare regulation? A multiple case study across four countries.有哪些方法可用于促进患者及其家属参与医疗保健监管?四个国家的多项案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05471-4.
9
The patient died: What about involvement in the investigation process?患者死亡:参与调查过程如何?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jun 17;32(5):342-346. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa034.
10
Next-of-Kin Involvement in Regulatory Investigations of Adverse Events That Caused Patient Death: A Process Evaluation (Part II: The Inspectors' Perspective).患者死亡相关不良事件监管调查中近亲属参与:过程评估(第二部分:检查官视角)。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1707-e1712. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000634.
检查人员对青少年护理质量评估的回应:一项关于让青少年参与检查的案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2998-9.
4
Is There a Mismatch Between the Perspectives of Patients and Regulators on Healthcare Quality? A Survey Study.患者和监管者对医疗质量的看法是否存在差异?一项调查研究。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Oct 1;17(7):473-482. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000413.
5
Classifying Patients' Complaints for Regulatory Purposes: A Pilot Study.为监管目的对患者投诉进行分类:一项试点研究。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Apr 1;17(3):e169-e176. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000297.
6
Learning from incidents in healthcare: the journey, not the arrival, matters.从医疗保健事件中学习:过程很重要,而非结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):252-256. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004853. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
Root Cause Analyses of Suicides of Mental Health Clients: Identifying Systematic Processes and Service-Level Prevention Strategies.心理健康服务对象自杀的根本原因分析:识别系统流程和服务层面的预防策略。
Crisis. 2015;36(5):316-24. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000328.
8
Patients' perspectives on the role of their complaints in the regulatory process.患者对其投诉在监管过程中所起作用的看法。
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):483-96. doi: 10.1111/hex.12373. Epub 2015 May 7.
9
Structuring patient and family involvement in medical error event disclosure and analysis.构建患者及家属参与医疗差错事件的披露与分析机制。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jan;33(1):46-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0831.
10
Including citizens in institutional reviews: expectations and experiences from the Dutch Healthcare Inspectorate.让公民参与机构审查:荷兰医疗保健检查局的期望与经验
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1463-73. doi: 10.1111/hex.12126. Epub 2013 Sep 24.