Kim Dong-Hyeok, Choi Jong-Il, Lee Kwang No, Ahn Jinhee, Roh Seung Young, Lee Dae In, Shim Jaemin, Kim Jin Seok, Lim Hong Euy, Park Sang Weon, Kim Young-Hoon
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, 73, Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 30;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0834-0.
There is a controversy as to whether catheter ablation should be the first-line therapy for tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (TBS) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with TBS and AF. Among 145 consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation of AF with TBS, 121 patients were studied.
Among 121 patients, 11 (9.1%) received implantation of a permanent pacemaker during a mean 21 months after ablation. Length of pause on termination of AF was significantly greater in patients who received pacemaker implantation after ablation than those who underwent ablation only (7.9 ± 3.5 vs. 5.1 ± 2.1 s, p < 0.001). Using a multivariate model, a long pause of 6.3 s or longer after termination of AF was associated with the requirement to implant a permanent pacemaker after ablation (HR 1.332, 95% CI 1.115-1.591, p = 0.002).
This study suggests that, in patients with AF predisposing to TBS, long pause on termination of AF predicts the need to implant a permanent pacemaker after catheter ablation.
对于房颤(AF)患者,导管消融是否应作为心动过速-心动过缓综合征(TBS)的一线治疗方法存在争议。
我们旨在研究TBS合并AF患者导管消融的长期临床结局。在145例连续接受TBS合并AF导管消融的患者中,对121例患者进行了研究。
在121例患者中,11例(9.1%)在消融后平均21个月接受了永久性起搏器植入。消融后接受起搏器植入的患者房颤终止时的停搏时间明显长于仅接受消融的患者(7.9±3.5秒对5.1±2.1秒,p<0.001)。使用多变量模型,房颤终止后6.3秒或更长时间的长停搏与消融后植入永久性起搏器的需求相关(HR 1.332,95%CI 1.115-1.591,p=0.002)。
本研究表明,在易患TBS的AF患者中,房颤终止时的长停搏预示着导管消融后需要植入永久性起搏器。