Suppr超能文献

病态窦房结综合征合并心房颤动患者额外经验性上腔静脉隔离对窦房结功能的中期影响。

Mid-term effects on sinus node function following additional empirical superior vena cava isolation in atrial fibrillation patients with sick sinus syndrome.

作者信息

Kanai Miwa, Higuchi Satoshi, Sakai Masayuki, Matsui Yuko, Hasegawa Shun, Yagishita Daigo, Shoda Morio, Yamaguchi Junichi

机构信息

Department of Cardiology Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center Yachiyo Japan.

Department of Cardiology Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Japan.

出版信息

J Arrhythm. 2025 Jun 30;41(4):e70126. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70126. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

AIM

The safety of including superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) along with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) remains uncertain, as this decision is often left to the discretion of individual physicians.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective study, 94 AF patients with SSS, who underwent PVI without prior pacemaker placement, were divided into two groups: those with ( = 67, age 66.0 ± 9.3 years, male 61%) and without ( = 27, age 66.6 ± 10.0 years, male 63%) additional empirical SVCI. SVCI was performed at 25-35 W, 10-20 mm superior to the earliest sites of activation during sinus rhythm. The primary endpoint compared atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence, pacemaker avoidance, and 24-hour ambulatory monitoring results between the SVCI and non-SVCI groups. Preprocedure minimum heart rate (SVCI 37.6 ± 11.6 Bpm vs. non-SVCI 37.0 ± 9.9 Bpm,  = 0.74) and maximum pause (SVCI 4.2 ± 2.7 Sec vs. non-SVCI 3.6 ± 2.8 Sec,  = 0.15) were not different between the two groups. During 36 months of follow-up after the last procedure, ATA recurrence rates (SVCI 33% vs. non-SVCI 34%,  = 0.82) and pacemaker avoidance rates (SVCI 84% vs. non-SVCI 93%,  = 0.32) Were Comparable between the two groups. At 36 months after the last procedure, minimum heart rate (SVCI 48.7 ± 10.2 bpm vs. non-SVCI 47.4 ± 8.3 bpm,  = 0.52) and maximum pause (SVCI 1.6 ± 1.0 sec vs. non-SVCI 1.6 ± 0.6 sec,  = 0.33) remained similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the addition of SVCI did not significantly increase the need for pacemaker implantation or lead to sinus node dysfunction in AF patients with SSS compared to PVI alone.

摘要

目的

对于患有病态窦房结综合征(SSS)的心房颤动(AF)患者,在肺静脉隔离(PVI)基础上联合上腔静脉隔离(SVCI)的安全性仍不确定,因为这一决定通常由个别医生自行斟酌。

方法与结果

在这项回顾性研究中,94例未预先植入起搏器而行PVI的SSS合并AF患者被分为两组:接受额外经验性SVCI的患者(n = 67,年龄66.0±9.3岁,男性61%)和未接受额外SVCI的患者(n = 27,年龄66.6±10.0岁,男性63%)。SVCI在窦性心律时最早激动部位上方25 - 35W、10 - 20mm处进行。主要终点是比较SVCI组和非SVCI组之间房性快速心律失常(ATA)复发、避免植入起搏器情况以及24小时动态监测结果。术前最低心率(SVCI组37.6±11.6次/分 vs. 非SVCI组37.0±9.9次/分,P = 0.74)和最长停搏时间(SVCI组4.2±2.7秒 vs. 非SVCI组3.6±2.8秒,P = 0.15)在两组之间无差异。在最后一次手术后的36个月随访期间,两组之间的ATA复发率(SVCI组33% vs. 非SVCI组34%,P = 0.82)和避免植入起搏器率(SVCI组84% vs. 非SVCI组93%,P = 0.32)相当。在最后一次手术后36个月时,两组之间的最低心率(SVCI组48.7±10.2次/分 vs. 非SVCI组47.4±8.3次/分,P = 0.52)和最长停搏时间(SVCI组1.6±1.0秒 vs. 非SVCI组1.6±0.6秒,P = 0.33)仍相似。

结论

在本研究中,与单纯PVI相比,对于患有SSS的AF患者,增加SVCI并未显著增加起搏器植入需求或导致窦房结功能障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2967/12207091/b9654af3f6d7/JOA3-41-e70126-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验