Suppr超能文献

[德国ICD-11-MMS测试版的现场测试:背景与方法]

[Field tests for the beta version of the ICD-11-MMS in Germany: background and methods].

作者信息

Stausberg Jürgen, Pollex-Krüger Annette, Semler Sebastian C, Vogel Ulrich, Reinecke Holger

机构信息

Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Deutschland.

Kuratorium für Fragen der Klassifikation im Gesundheitswesen, Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, Köln, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Jul;61(7):836-844. doi: 10.1007/s00103-018-2751-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) has been developing the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) since 2007. ICD-11 is different from the ICD-10 in volume and structure. Therefore, the WHO planned field tests with a coding of diagnoses and cases.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the background of the field tests and their implementation in Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Interested parties were invited to submit proposals through a call to the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF). The Technology, Methods, and Infrastructure for Networked Medical Research (TMF) was responsible for the coordination, supported by the German Institute for Medical Documentation and Information (DIMDI). The target was a beta version of the ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics (ICD-11-MMS), denoted as "draft for quality assurance".

RESULTS

Eleven field tests were maintained between March and September 2017. With the exception of one field test analyzing diagnoses terms from the thesaurus of the ICD-10-GM, all field tests focused on a specific medical field. Eight different quality criteria were investigated over the 11 field tests, and 22 of the 27 chapters of the ICD-11-MMS were at least partially covered.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the strict time frame, the field tests were successfully implemented and concluded in Germany. Mostly, the ICD-11 tools from the WHO were used. A high percentage of the ICD chapters were partially covered. In summary, it has been demonstrated for the first time that field tests are a valuable approach to evaluate the ICD in parallel to its development. However, a methodological framework integrating the field tests should be developed, taking into account all relevant requirements.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)自2007年起一直在制定《国际疾病分类》(ICD)的第11次修订版。ICD-11在篇幅和结构上与ICD-10有所不同。因此,WHO计划进行诊断和病例编码的现场测试。

目的

描述现场测试的背景及其在德国的实施情况。

材料与方法

通过向科学医学协会联合会(AWMF)发出呼吁,邀请有关各方提交提案。网络医学研究的技术、方法和基础设施(TMF)负责协调,德国医学文献与信息研究所(DIMDI)提供支持。目标是获得用于死亡率和发病率统计的ICD-11测试版(ICD-11-MMS),即“质量保证草案”。

结果

2017年3月至9月期间进行了11次现场测试。除了一项分析ICD-10-GM词库中诊断术语的现场测试外,所有现场测试都集中在一个特定的医学领域。在这11次现场测试中,研究了8种不同的质量标准,ICD-11-MMS的27章中有22章至少部分得到了覆盖。

结论

尽管时间框架严格,但现场测试在德国成功实施并完成。大部分情况下使用了WHO的ICD-11工具。ICD各章的大部分都得到了部分覆盖。总之,首次证明现场测试是在ICD开发过程中对其进行评估的一种有价值的方法。然而,应制定一个整合现场测试的方法框架,同时考虑到所有相关要求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验