Nyberg Stian K, Berg Ole Kristian, Helgerud Jan, Wang Eivind
Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Molde University College, Molde, Norway.
Physiol Rep. 2018 May;6(10):e13696. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13696.
Assessment of forearm oxygen uptake (V˙O ) during handgrip exercise is a keenly investigated concept for observing small muscle mass metabolism. Although a combination of Doppler ultrasound measurements of brachial artery blood flow (Q˙) and blood gas drawn from a deep forearm vein has been utilized to calculate forearm V˙O for more than two decades, the applicability of this experimental design may benefit from a thorough evaluation of its reliability during graded exercise. Therefore, we evaluated the reliability of this technique during incremental handgrip exercise in ten healthy young (24 ± 3(SD) years.) males. V˙O and work rate (WR) exhibited a linear relationship (1.0 W: 43.8 ± 10.1 mL·min ; 1.5 W: 53.8 ± 14.1 mL·min ; 2.0 W: 63.4 ± 16.3 mL·min ; 2.5 W: 72.2 ± 17.6 mL·min ; 3.0 W: 79.2 ± 18.6 mL·min ; r = 0.65, P < 0.01). In turn, V˙O was strongly associated with Q˙ (1.0 W: 359 ± 86 mL·min ; 1.5 W: 431 ± 112 mL·min ; 2.0 W: 490 ± 123 mL·min ; 2.5 W: 556 ± 112 mL·min ; 3.0 W: 622 ± 131 mL·min ; r = 0.96; P < 0.01), whereas arteriovenous oxygen difference (a-vO ) remained constant following all WRs (123 ± 11-130 ± 10 mL·L ). Average V˙O test-retest difference was -0.4 mL·min with ±2SD limits of agreement (LOA) of 8.4 and -9.2 mL·min , respectively, whereas coefficients of variation (CVs) ranged from 4-7%. Accordingly, test-retest Q˙ difference was 11.9 mL·min (LOA: 84.1 mL·min ; -60.4 mL·min ) with CVs between 4 and 7%. Test-retest difference for a-vO was -0.28 mL·dL (LOA: 1.26mL·dL ; -1.82 mL·dL ) with 3-5% CVs. In conclusion, our results revealed that forearm V˙O determination by Doppler ultrasound and direct venous sampling is linearly related to WR, and a reliable experimental design across a range of exercise intensities.
在握力运动期间评估前臂摄氧量(V˙O )是一个备受关注的用于观察小肌肉群代谢的概念。尽管将肱动脉血流的多普勒超声测量值(Q˙)与从前臂深部静脉采集的血气相结合来计算前臂V˙O 已有二十多年,但这种实验设计的适用性可能受益于对其在分级运动期间可靠性的全面评估。因此,我们评估了该技术在十名健康年轻男性(24±3(标准差)岁)进行递增握力运动期间的可靠性。V˙O 与工作率(WR)呈现线性关系(1.0W:43.8±10.1mL·min ;1.5W:53.8±14.1mL·min ;2.0W:63.4±16.3mL·min ;2.5W:72.2±17.6mL·min ;3.0W:79.2±18.6mL·min ;r = 0.65,P <0.01)。相应地,V˙O 与Q˙密切相关(1.0W:359±86mL·min ;1.5W:431±112mL·min ;2.0W:490±123mL·min ;2.5W:556±112mL·min ;3.0W:622±131mL·min ;r = 0.96;P <0.01),而在所有WRs之后动静脉氧差(a - vO )保持恒定(123±11 - 130±10mL·L )。V˙O 重测差异的平均值为 - 0.4mL·min ,一致性界限(LOA)的±2SD分别为8.4和 - 9.2mL·min ,而变异系数(CVs)范围为4 - 7%。相应地,Q˙重测差异为11.9mL·min (LOA:84.1mL·min ; - 6:4mL·min ),CVs在4%至7%之间。a - vO 的重测差异为 - 0.28mL·dL (LOA:1.26mL·dL ; - 1.82mL·dL ),CVs为3 - 5%。总之,我们的结果表明,通过多普勒超声和直接静脉采样测定的前臂V˙O 与WR呈线性相关,并且在一系列运动强度下是一种可靠的实验设计。