Suppr超能文献

肝硬化患者临床结局的预测因素。

Predictors of clinical outcomes in cirrhosis patients.

作者信息

Haj Mona, Rockey Don C

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;34(4):266-271. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000450.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review aims to explain the different systems available to clinicians for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cirrhosis is the final stage of chronic liver disease and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The most commonly utilized tools to predict outcomes in patients with cirrhosis include the following: assessing severity of portal hypertension using hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements, using scoring systems such as the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) scores, and recently, clinical staging systems based on cirrhosis-related clinical complications. Assessing portal pressure with HVPG measurements provides valuable prognostic information, yet is costly, time-consuming, and invasive. MELD and CPT scores can be calculated quickly and not only assess liver function, but also yield predictive information. However, they represent only one point in time, and do not take into account the full clinical picture. Clinical staging systems have traditionally been focused on compensated and decompensated stages, with newer models assessing the influence of cirrhosis-related complications. However, these are not commonly utilized.

SUMMARY

Predicting clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis is challenging, and is likely best accomplished with a combination of objective data (such as MELD and HVPG provide) in addition to the clinical course of cirrhosis.

摘要

综述目的

本次综述旨在解释临床医生可用于预测肝硬化患者临床结局的不同系统。

最新发现

肝硬化是慢性肝病的终末期,与高发病率和死亡率相关。预测肝硬化患者结局最常用的工具包括:通过测量肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)评估门静脉高压的严重程度,使用诸如终末期肝病模型(MELD)和Child-Pugh-Turcotte(CPT)评分等评分系统,以及最近基于肝硬化相关临床并发症的临床分期系统。通过HVPG测量评估门静脉压力可提供有价值的预后信息,但成本高、耗时且具有侵入性。MELD和CPT评分可以快速计算,不仅能评估肝功能,还能产生预测信息。然而,它们仅代表一个时间点,并未考虑完整的临床情况。传统上,临床分期系统侧重于代偿期和失代偿期,新模型则评估肝硬化相关并发症的影响。然而,这些方法并不常用。

总结

预测肝硬化患者的临床结局具有挑战性,除了肝硬化的临床病程外,结合客观数据(如MELD和HVPG所提供的数据)可能是最好的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验