Division of Rheumatology Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018 May 30;20(7):42. doi: 10.1007/s11926-018-0752-2.
Increased cardiovascular (CV) risk and associated mortality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are not fully explained by traditional CV risk factors. This review discusses the epidemiology and mechanisms of increased CV risk in RA and treatment effects on CV risk focusing on biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and JAK inhibitors.
Intermediary metabolic changes by inflammatory cytokines are observed in body composition, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity of RA patients, leading to accelerated atherosclerosis and increased CV risk. Successful treatment with DMARDs has shown beneficial effects on these metabolic changes and ultimately CV outcomes, in proportion to the treatment efficacy in general but also with drug-specific mechanisms. Recent data provide further information on comparative CV safety between biologic DMARDs or JAK inhibitors as well as their safety signals for non-atherosclerotic CV events. CV benefits or safety signals associated with DMARD treatments can differ despite similar drug efficacy against RA, suggesting that both anti-inflammatory and drug-specific mechanisms are involved in altering CV risk.
心血管(CV)风险增加和相关死亡率在类风湿关节炎(RA)中不能完全用传统的 CV 危险因素来解释。本综述讨论了 RA 中 CV 风险增加的流行病学和机制,以及生物改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)和 JAK 抑制剂对 CV 风险的治疗效果,重点讨论了这些内容。
炎症细胞因子导致 RA 患者的身体成分、血脂谱和胰岛素敏感性发生中间代谢变化,导致动脉粥样硬化加速和 CV 风险增加。DMARD 的成功治疗显示对这些代谢变化和最终的 CV 结果有有益的影响,与一般治疗效果成比例,但也有药物特异性机制。最近的数据提供了关于生物 DMARD 或 JAK 抑制剂之间比较 CV 安全性以及它们对非动脉粥样硬化性 CV 事件的安全性信号的进一步信息。尽管针对 RA 的药物疗效相似,但 DMARD 治疗相关的 CV 获益或安全性信号可能不同,这表明抗炎和药物特异性机制都参与了改变 CV 风险。