From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Mar 1;37(3):e129-e135. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001540.
Traumatic brain injury is the leading cause of death and disability in children worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the association between physician risk tolerance and head computed tomography (CT) use in patients with minor head injury (MHI) in the emergency department (ED).
We retrospectively analyzed pediatric patients (<17 years old) with MHI in the ED and then administered 2 questionnaires (a risk-taking subscale [RTS] of the Jackson Personality Inventory and a malpractice fear scale [MFS]) to attending physicians who had evaluated these patients and made decisions regarding head CT use. The primary outcome was head CT use during ED evaluation; the secondary outcome was ED length of stay and final diagnosis of intracranial injury (ICI).
Of 523 patients with MHI, 233 (44.6%) underwent brain CT, and 16 (3.1%) received a final diagnosis of ICI. Among the 16 emergency physicians (EPs), the median scores of the MFS and RTS were 22 (interquartile range, 17-26) and 23 (interquartile range, 19-25), respectively. Emergency physicians who were most risk averse tended to order more head CT scans compared with the more risk-tolerant EPs (56.96% vs 37.37%; odds ratio, 8.463; confidence interval, 2.783-25.736). The ED length of stay (P = 0.442 and P = 0.889) and final diagnosis (P = 0.155 and P = 0.835) of ICI were not significantly associated with the RTS and MFS scores.
Individual EP risk tolerance, as measured by RTS, was predictive of CT use in pediatric patients with MHI.
创伤性脑损伤是全球儿童死亡和残疾的主要原因。本研究旨在确定急诊(ED)中小头部损伤(MHI)患者的医生风险承受能力与头部计算机断层扫描(CT)使用之间的关系。
我们回顾性分析了 ED 中患有 MHI 的儿科患者,然后向评估这些患者并决定头部 CT 使用的主治医生发放了两份问卷(杰克逊人格问卷的风险承受能力子量表[RTS]和医疗事故恐惧量表[MFS])。主要结局是 ED 评估期间进行头部 CT;次要结局是 ED 住院时间和颅内损伤(ICI)的最终诊断。
在 523 例 MHI 患者中,233 例(44.6%)接受了脑部 CT,16 例(3.1%)最终诊断为 ICI。在 16 名急诊医师(EPs)中,MFS 和 RTS 的中位数得分为 22(四分位距,17-26)和 23(四分位距,19-25)。风险规避性最强的急诊医生与风险承受能力更强的 EP 相比,更倾向于开更多的头部 CT 扫描(56.96%比 37.37%;比值比,8.463;置信区间,2.783-25.736)。ED 住院时间(P=0.442 和 P=0.889)和 ICI 的最终诊断(P=0.155 和 P=0.835)与 RTS 和 MFS 评分无显著相关性。
通过 RTS 测量的个体 EP 风险承受能力可预测 MHI 儿科患者的 CT 使用。