Parasitology Department, Paramedical School, Ilam university of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Department of Medical Entomology & Vector Control, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Infect Genet Evol. 2018 Sep;63:257-268. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.05.021. Epub 2018 May 27.
The diagnosis of leishmaniasis relies mainly on the use of invasive processes, to collect the biological material for detecting Leishmania parasites. Body fluids, which can be collected by non-invasive process, would greatly facilitate the leishmaniasis diagnosis. In the present study, we investigated the potency of urine immunoblotting to diagnose cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis and we compared with routine molecular methods. A total of 80 samples, including 40 sera and their 40 corresponding urine samples were collected from 37 suspected patients with cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis, and 3 healthy individuals (as control), in Ilam and Ardabil provinces of Iran. All sera and urine samples were analyzed, using immunoblotting. The confirmation of leishmaniasis infection was performed, using conventional and quantitative PCRs as well as by sequencing the amplicons. Among 37 suspected patients, 23 patients presented cutaneous lesions (CL) and 14 exhibited clinical symptoms reminiscent of visceral leishmaniasis (L. infantum). Among cutaneous patients, 15 were positive for zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (L. major), and eight for anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (L. tropica). Molecular quantification of Leishmania parasites was performed on sera, urines and cutaneous biopsies of CL and VL patients, demonstrating that parasite load is lower in urines, compared to sera or biopsy. DNA can be detected in 20 out of 23 (86.9%) CL urine samples and in 13 out of 14 (92.8%) VL urine samples. Immunodetection analysis demonstrates that 22 out of 23 (95.6%) sera from CL patients and all patients suspected with VL are positive. For urine samples, 18 out of 23 (78.2%) urine of CL patients and 13 out of 14 (92.8%) urine of VL patients were positive, using Western blot. Therefore, immunodetection and molecular analysis using urine samples can be used as a diagnostic tool for surveying cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis.
利什曼病的诊断主要依赖于使用侵入性过程来收集用于检测利什曼原虫寄生虫的生物材料。可以通过非侵入性过程收集的体液将极大地方便利什曼病的诊断。在本研究中,我们研究了尿液免疫印迹在诊断皮肤利什曼病和内脏利什曼病中的效力,并将其与常规分子方法进行了比较。共收集了 80 份样本,包括 37 名疑似皮肤和内脏利什曼病患者的 40 份血清及其 40 份相应尿液样本,以及 3 名健康个体(作为对照),来自伊朗的 Ilam 和 Ardabil 省。所有血清和尿液样本均通过免疫印迹进行分析。使用常规和定量 PCR 以及扩增子测序来确认利什曼病感染。在 37 名疑似患者中,23 名患者出现皮肤病变(CL),14 名患者出现类似内脏利什曼病(L. infantum)的临床症状。在皮肤患者中,15 例为动物源性皮肤利什曼病(L. major)阳性,8 例为人类源性皮肤利什曼病(L. tropica)阳性。对 CL 和 VL 患者的血清、尿液和皮肤活检进行了利什曼寄生虫的分子定量,结果表明与血清或活检相比,尿液中的寄生虫负荷较低。可以在 23 例 CL 尿液样本中的 20 例和 14 例 VL 尿液样本中的 13 例中检测到 DNA。免疫检测分析表明,23 例 CL 患者中的 22 例(95.6%)和所有疑似 VL 患者的血清均为阳性。对于尿液样本,CL 患者的 23 例尿液中有 18 例(78.2%)和 VL 患者的 14 例尿液中有 13 例(92.8%)尿液为阳性,采用 Western blot。因此,尿液样本的免疫检测和分子分析可作为皮肤和内脏利什曼病调查的诊断工具。