Suppr超能文献

循环游离DNA作为结直肠癌的诊断标志物:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Circulating cell free DNA as the diagnostic marker for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Xin, Shi Xia-Qing, Zeng Peng-Wei, Mo Fong-Ming, Chen Zi-Hua

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.

Key Laboratory of Nanobiological Technology of Chinese Ministry of Health, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2018 May 11;9(36):24514-24524. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25314.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quantitative analyses of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are suggested to be a promising method for the detection of colorectal cancer, validated clinical relevance of cfDNA has not been published so far. Though some of the inconsistent results were published. This study is the first meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circulating cfDNA as non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies concerning a quantitative analysis of circulating cfDNA for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer met the inclusion criteria. Data includes 1,258 patients with colorectal cancer and 803 healthy individuals as control was analyzed. The summary estimates were as follow: sensitivity, 0.735 (95% CI 0.713-0.757); specificity, 0.918 (95% CI, 0.900-0.934); positive likelihood ratio, 8.295 (95% CI, 5.037-13.659); negative likelihood ratio, 0.300 (95% CI, 0.231-0.391); diagnostic odds ratio, 30.783 (95% CI, 16.965-55.856); and area under the curve, 0.8818 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93), respectively. Publication bias was not evident with Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test ( = 0.197).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from their inception to August 07, 2017. Analyses were conducted by Meta-DiSc 1.4 and Stata 12.0. Diagnostic accuracy in sensitivity, specificity and aspects were pooled. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Clinical utility of the cfDNA was evaluated by Fagan nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggested that the diagnostic accuracy of circulating cfDNA has unsatisfactory sensitivity but acceptable specificity for diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the integrity index (ALU247/ALU115) is better than absolute DNA concentration in diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer.

摘要

背景

循环游离DNA(cfDNA)的定量分析被认为是一种很有前景的检测结直肠癌的方法,但目前尚未发表有关cfDNA临床相关性的确证研究。尽管有一些结果不一致的研究发表。本研究是首次系统评价循环cfDNA作为结直肠癌非侵入性生物标志物诊断准确性的荟萃分析。

结果

14项关于循环cfDNA定量分析诊断结直肠癌的研究符合纳入标准。分析的数据包括1258例结直肠癌患者和803例健康个体作为对照。汇总估计如下:灵敏度为0.735(95%可信区间0.713 - 0.757);特异度为0.918(95%可信区间0.900 - 0.934);阳性似然比为8.295(95%可信区间5.037 - 13.659);阴性似然比为0.300(95%可信区间0.231 - 0.391);诊断比值比为30.783(95%可信区间16.965 - 55.856);曲线下面积分别为0.8818(95%可信区间0.88 - 0.93)。Deeks漏斗图不对称检验显示发表偏倚不明显(P = 0.197)。

材料与方法

在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和中国知网中检索从建库至2017年8月7日的系统文献。采用Meta-DiSc 1.4和Stata 12.0进行分析。汇总灵敏度、特异度等方面的诊断准确性。进行亚组分析和Meta回归以确定异质性来源。通过Fagan列线图评估cfDNA的临床应用价值。

结论

我们的荟萃分析表明,循环cfDNA对结直肠癌诊断的准确性具有不令人满意的灵敏度,但特异度尚可。此外,完整性指数(ALU247/ALU115)在结直肠癌诊断准确性方面优于绝对DNA浓度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b675/5966252/8d2e210baa7e/oncotarget-09-24514-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验