Gu Zhitao, Wang Huimin, Mao Teng, Ji Chunyu, Xiang Yangwei, Zhu Yan, Xu Ping, Fang Wentao
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Department of Pulmonary Function, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Apr;10(4):2331-2337. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.163.
Limited resections for early stage lung cancer have been of increasing interests recently. However, it is still unclear to what extent a limited resection could preserve pulmonary function comparing to standard lobectomy, especially in the context of minimally invasive surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative changes of spirometry in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy or limited resections.
Spirometry tests were obtained prospectively before and 6 months after 75 VATS lobectomy, 34 VATS segmentectomy, 15 VATS wedge resection. Eleven VATS mediastinal procedures without lung resection were taken as a control group. Results were compared between groups of different resection extent.
Demographic characteristics and preoperative pulmonary function showed no differences among the four groups. Forced vital capacity (FVC) loss after lobectomy was significantly greater than after segmentectomy (P=0.048), and much significantly greater than after wedge resection (P<0.001). Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) loss after lobectomy was similar to segmentectomy (P=0.273), both significantly greater than after wedge resection (P<0.01). Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) loss was similar among these three groups (P=0.293). There was no significant difference in any spirometry index between wedge resection and mediastinal procedures (FVC: P=0.856; FEV1: P=0.671; DLCO: P=0.057). When compared by average value per segment resected, pulmonary function loss was significantly less after lobectomy than after segmentectomy in all spirometry indexes (P<0.001). On average, pulmonary function loss was around 5% per segment for VATS lobectomy and 10% per segment for VATS segmentectomy.
In minimal invasive surgery, wedge resection best preserves pulmonary function with similar spirometry change with VATS mediastinal procedures without lung resection. Compared with VATS lobectomy, VATS segmentectomy may help minimize loss of FVC but not FEV1 or DLCO. Pulmonary function loss per segment resected is doubled after VATS segmentectomy than after lobectomy. These results should be taken into account when deciding the extent of resection for patients with early stage lung cancer.
早期肺癌的有限切除近来越来越受到关注。然而,与标准肺叶切除术相比,有限切除在多大程度上能够保留肺功能仍不明确,尤其是在微创手术的背景下。本研究的目的是评估接受电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺叶切除术或有限切除的患者术后肺量计的变化。
前瞻性地获取了75例VATS肺叶切除术、34例VATS肺段切除术、15例VATS楔形切除术患者术前及术后6个月的肺量计测试结果。11例未行肺切除的VATS纵隔手术患者作为对照组。对不同切除范围的组间结果进行比较。
四组患者的人口统计学特征和术前肺功能无差异。肺叶切除术后的用力肺活量(FVC)损失显著大于肺段切除术后(P = 0.048),且远大于楔形切除术后(P < 0.001)。肺叶切除术后的1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)损失与肺段切除术后相似(P = 0.273),两者均显著大于楔形切除术后(P < 0.01)。这三组的肺一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)损失相似(P = 0.293)。楔形切除术与纵隔手术之间的任何肺量计指标均无显著差异(FVC:P = 0.856;FEV1:P = 0.671;DLCO:P = 0.057)。按每切除一个肺段的平均值比较时,肺叶切除术后所有肺量计指标的肺功能损失均显著小于肺段切除术后(P < 0.001)。平均而言,VATS肺叶切除术每切除一个肺段的肺功能损失约为5%,VATS肺段切除术每切除一个肺段的肺功能损失约为10%。
在微创手术中,楔形切除术最能保留肺功能,其肺量计变化与未行肺切除的VATS纵隔手术相似。与VATS肺叶切除术相比,VATS肺段切除术可能有助于使FVC损失最小化,但对FEV1或DLCO无此作用。VATS肺段切除术后每切除一个肺段的肺功能损失是肺叶切除术后的两倍。在决定早期肺癌患者的切除范围时应考虑这些结果。