MacNeill Andrea J, Lillywhite Robert, Brown Carl J
Division of General Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
Lancet Planet Health. 2017 Dec;1(9):e381-e388. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30162-6. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
Climate change is a major global public health priority. The delivery of health-care services generates considerable greenhouse gas emissions. Operating theatres are a resource-intensive subsector of health care, with high energy demands, consumable throughput, and waste volumes. The environmental impacts of these activities are generally accepted as necessary for the provision of quality care, but have not been examined in detail. In this study, we estimate the carbon footprint of operating theatres in hospitals in three health systems.
Surgical suites at three academic quaternary-care hospitals were studied over a 1-year period in Canada (Vancouver General Hospital, VGH), the USA (University of Minnesota Medical Center, UMMC), and the UK (John Radcliffe Hospital, JRH). Greenhouse gas emissions were estimated using primary activity data and applicable emissions factors, and reported according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
Site greenhouse gas evaluations were done between Jan 1 and Dec 31, 2011. The surgical suites studied were found to have annual carbon footprints of 5 187 936 kg of CO equivalents (COe) at JRH, 4 181 864 kg of COe at UMMC, and 3 218 907 kg of COe at VGH. On a per unit area basis, JRH had the lowest carbon intensity at 1702 kg COe/m, compared with 1951 kg COe/m at VGH and 2284 kg COe/m at UMMC. Based on case volumes at all three sites, VGH had the lowest carbon intensity per operation at 146 kg COe per case compared with 173 kg COe per case at JRH and 232 kg COe per case at UMMC. Anaesthetic gases and energy consumption were the largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions. Preferential use of desflurane resulted in a ten-fold difference in anaesthetic gas emissions between hospitals. Theatres were found to be three to six times more energy-intense than the hospital as a whole, primarily due to heating, ventilation, and air conditioning requirements. Overall, the carbon footprint of surgery in the three countries studied is estimated to be 9·7 million tonnes of COe per year.
Operating theatres are an appreciable source of greenhouse gas emissions. Emissions reduction strategies including avoidance of desflurane and occupancy-based ventilation have the potential to lessen the climate impact of surgical services without compromising patient safety.
None.
气候变化是全球主要的公共卫生优先事项。医疗服务的提供产生了大量的温室气体排放。手术室是医疗保健中资源密集型的子部门,能源需求高、耗材吞吐量和废弃物量都很大。这些活动对环境的影响通常被认为是提供优质医疗服务所必需的,但尚未进行详细研究。在本研究中,我们估算了三个医疗系统中医院手术室的碳足迹。
在加拿大(温哥华总医院,VGH)、美国(明尼苏达大学医学中心,UMMC)和英国(约翰·拉德克利夫医院,JRH)的三家学术性四级医疗医院的手术套房进行了为期1年的研究。使用主要活动数据和适用的排放因子估算温室气体排放,并根据《温室气体议定书》进行报告。
于2011年1月1日至12月31日期间进行了场地温室气体评估。研究发现,所研究的手术套房在JRH的年碳足迹为5187936千克二氧化碳当量(COe),在UMMC为4181864千克COe,在VGH为3218907千克COe。按单位面积计算,JRH的碳强度最低,为1702千克COe/平方米,而VGH为1951千克COe/平方米,UMMC为2284千克COe/平方米。根据所有三个地点的病例数量,VGH每台手术的碳强度最低,为每例146千克COe,而JRH为每例173千克COe,UMMC为每例232千克COe。麻醉气体和能源消耗是温室气体排放的最大来源。地氟烷的优先使用导致医院之间麻醉气体排放相差十倍。发现手术室的能源强度比医院整体高三到六倍,主要是由于供暖、通风和空调需求。总体而言,所研究的三个国家的手术碳足迹估计每年为970万吨COe。
手术室是温室气体排放的一个重要来源。包括避免使用地氟烷和基于占用情况的通风在内的减排策略有可能在不影响患者安全的情况下减轻手术服务对气候的影响。
无。