Influence of normative data's walking speed on the computation of conventional gait indices.

The pathology's impact on gait pattern may be overestimated by conventional gait indices (Gillette Gait Index - GGI, Gait Deviation Index - GDI, Gait Profile Score - GPS), since impairments' consequences on kinematics may be amplified by a change in walking speed. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the influence of walking speed on the computation of gait indices and to propose a corrective method to cancel the effects of walking speed. Spatiotemporal parameters and kinematics of fifty-four asymptomatic participants (30 M/24 W, 37.9 ± 13.7 years, 72.8 ± 13.3 kg, 1.74 ± 0.10 m) were collected at four speed conditions (C:[0,0.4] m s, C:[0.4,0.8] m s, C:[0.8,1.2] m s, C:spontaneous). Four values of each index were computed for each trial using successively the four conditions as normative data repository. Mean values over all participants were statistically compared (paired t-tests, 95% confidence level). Indices values computed with normative at equivalent walking speed were not statistically different from reference values. Meanwhile, deviations appeared when the walking speed discrepancy between conditions and normative increased. These drifts related to walking speed mismatch have been quantified and fitting functions proposed. A correction was applied to indices. GGI was efficiently adjusted while GDI and GPS remain different from their reference values for C and C. Gait indices must be interpreted cautiously in function of the normative data repository's walking speed used for computation. Furthermore, a coupled use of conventional and corrected gait indices could lead to a better comprehension of the contribution of impairments and walking speed on gait deviations and overall gait quality.