Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):987-992. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216.
Food's environmental impacts are created by millions of diverse producers. To identify solutions that are effective under this heterogeneity, we consolidated data covering five environmental indicators; 38,700 farms; and 1600 processors, packaging types, and retailers. Impact can vary 50-fold among producers of the same product, creating substantial mitigation opportunities. However, mitigation is complicated by trade-offs, multiple ways for producers to achieve low impacts, and interactions throughout the supply chain. Producers have limits on how far they can reduce impacts. Most strikingly, impacts of the lowest-impact animal products typically exceed those of vegetable substitutes, providing new evidence for the importance of dietary change. Cumulatively, our findings support an approach where producers monitor their own impacts, flexibly meet environmental targets by choosing from multiple practices, and communicate their impacts to consumers.
食物的环境影响是由数百万种不同的生产者造成的。为了在这种异质性下找到有效的解决方案,我们整合了涵盖五个环境指标的数据;涉及 38700 个农场;以及 1600 个加工商、包装类型和零售商。同一产品的生产者之间的影响可能相差 50 倍,这为减排创造了大量机会。然而,由于生产者之间存在权衡取舍、实现低影响的多种方式以及供应链中的相互作用,减排变得复杂起来。生产者在减少影响方面存在限制。最引人注目的是,最低影响的动物产品的影响通常超过了蔬菜替代品的影响,这为饮食改变的重要性提供了新的证据。总的来说,我们的研究结果支持一种方法,即生产者监测自己的影响,通过从多种实践中进行选择来灵活地满足环境目标,并将其影响传达给消费者。