• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌治疗中的手术质量:一项自愿观察性研究能取得什么成果?

Surgical Quality in Rectal Cancer Management: What Can Be Achieved by a Voluntary Observational Study?

作者信息

Dziki Łukasz, Otto Ronny, Lippert Hans, Mroczkowski Paweł, Jannasch Olof

机构信息

Department for General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University Lodz, Pl. Hallera 1, PL-90-647 Łódź, Poland.

Institute for Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine Ltd., Otto-von-Guericke-University, Leipziger Str. 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 May 8;2018:3925062. doi: 10.1155/2018/3925062. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1155/2018/3925062
PMID:29853860
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5964497/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Countries with nationwide quality programmes in colorectal cancer report an improved outcome. In Germany, a self-organized and self-financed observational quality assurance project exists, based on voluntary participation. The object of the present study was to ascertain whether this nationwide project also improves the outcome of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

The German Quality Assurance in Colorectal Cancer Project started in 2000 and by 2012 contained 85,000 patients. Inclusion criteria for the study were participation for the entire period of 13 years and treatment of rectal cancer. The following parameters were analysed: (1) patient related: age, gender, ASA classification, T-stage, and N-stage, (2) system related: frequency of preoperative CT and MRI, and (3) outcome related: CRM status, complications, and hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Forty-one of the 345 hospitals treating 11,597 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median age increased from 67 to 69 years ( = 0.002). ASA stages III and IV increased from 32.0% to 37.6% ( = 0.005) and from 2.0% to 3.3% ( = 0.022), respectively. The use of CT rose from 67.2% to 88.8% ( < 0.001) and that of MRI from 5.0% to 35.2% ( < 0.001). The proportion of patients suffering from complications decreased from 7.9% to 5.3% ( < 0.001) for intraoperative and from 28.0% to 18.6% ( < 0.001) for postoperative surgical complications, but general postoperative complications increased from 25.8% to 29.5% ( = 0.006). The distribution of histopathological stage, anastomotic leakage, and in-hospital mortality did not change significantly.

CONCLUSION

Participation in a quality assurance project improves compliance with treatment standards, especially for diagnostic procedures. An improvement of surgical results will require further investment in training.

摘要

目的

开展全国性结直肠癌质量项目的国家报告称治疗效果有所改善。在德国,存在一个基于自愿参与的、自筹资金的自组织观察性质量保证项目。本研究的目的是确定这个全国性项目是否也能改善结直肠癌的治疗效果。

方法

德国结直肠癌质量保证项目始于2000年,到2012年涵盖了85000名患者。该研究的纳入标准为参与13年的整个时间段且接受直肠癌治疗。分析了以下参数:(1)患者相关参数:年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、T分期和N分期;(2)系统相关参数:术前CT和MRI的使用频率;(3)结果相关参数:环周切缘(CRM)状态、并发症和医院死亡率。

结果

治疗11597名患者的345家医院中有41家符合纳入标准。中位年龄从67岁增至69岁(P = 0.002)。ASAⅢ期和Ⅳ期分别从32.0%增至37.6%(P = 0.005)和从2.0%增至3.3%(P = 0.022)。CT的使用从67.2%增至88.8%(P < 0.001),MRI的使用从5.0%增至35.2%(P < 0.001)。术中并发症患者比例从7.9%降至5.3%(P < 0.001),术后手术并发症患者比例从28.0%降至18.6%(P < 0.001),但术后总体并发症从25.8%增至29.5%(P = 0.006)。组织病理学分期、吻合口漏和院内死亡率的分布无显著变化。

结论

参与质量保证项目可提高对治疗标准的依从性,尤其是在诊断程序方面。要改善手术效果还需要在培训方面进一步投入。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d369/5964497/5a0311883417/GRP2018-3925062.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d369/5964497/5a0311883417/GRP2018-3925062.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d369/5964497/5a0311883417/GRP2018-3925062.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgical Quality in Rectal Cancer Management: What Can Be Achieved by a Voluntary Observational Study?直肠癌治疗中的手术质量:一项自愿观察性研究能取得什么成果?
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 May 8;2018:3925062. doi: 10.1155/2018/3925062. eCollection 2018.
2
International quality assurance project in colorectal cancer-unifying diagnostic and histopathological evaluation.结直肠癌国际质量保证项目——统一诊断与组织病理学评估
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Apr;399(4):473-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1176-8. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
3
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.丹麦结直肠癌的生存情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428.
4
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: effects on anastomotic leak rate and postoperative bladder dysfunction after non-emergency sphincter-preserving anterior rectal resection. Results of the Quality Assurance in Rectal Cancer Surgery multicenter observational trial.新辅助放化疗治疗直肠癌:对非紧急保肛前直肠切除术后吻合口漏率和术后膀胱功能障碍的影响。直肠癌外科质量保证多中心观察性试验的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Nov;395(8):1031-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0708-0. Epub 2010 Aug 15.
5
[Risk factor analysis on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patient with neoadjuvant therapy and establishment of a nomogram prediction model].[新辅助治疗直肠癌患者腹腔镜手术后吻合口漏的危险因素分析及列线图预测模型的建立]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;22(8):748-754. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.08.009.
6
[Quality evaluation in colorectal surgery in dependence on health-care categories of hospitals - minor differences in outcome with room for improvement in process quality].[结直肠手术的质量评估取决于医院的医疗保健类别——结果差异不大,但过程质量仍有改进空间]
Gesundheitswesen. 2011 Mar;73(3):134-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1246214. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
7
Epidemiology, surgical management and early postoperative outcome in a cohort of gastric cancer patients of a tertiary referral center in relation to multi-center quality assurance studies.一家三级转诊中心的一组胃癌患者的流行病学、手术管理及术后早期结局与多中心质量保证研究的关系
Pol Przegl Chir. 2011 Mar;83(3):123-34. doi: 10.2478/v10035-011-0020-x.
8
Risk factors, short and long term outcome of anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer.直肠癌吻合口漏的危险因素、短期和长期结局
Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 3;6(34):36884-93. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5170.
9
German Bowel Cancer Center: An Attempt to Improve Treatment Quality.德国肠癌中心:提高治疗质量的一次尝试。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:456476. doi: 10.1155/2015/456476. Epub 2015 May 3.
10
QuickSilver: A Phase II Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria to Identify "Good Prognosis" Rectal Cancer Patients Eligible for Primary Surgery.快银:一项使用磁共振成像标准来识别适合一期手术的“预后良好”直肠癌患者的II期研究。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Apr 14;4(2):e41. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4151.

引用本文的文献

1
Rectal Cancer: Are 12 Lymph Nodes the Limit?直肠癌:12个淋巴结是极限吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 30;15(13):3447. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133447.

本文引用的文献

1
German Bowel Cancer Center: An Attempt to Improve Treatment Quality.德国肠癌中心:提高治疗质量的一次尝试。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:456476. doi: 10.1155/2015/456476. Epub 2015 May 3.
2
Mortality after common rectal surgery in Japan: a study on low anterior resection from a newly established nationwide large-scale clinical database.日本常见直肠手术后的死亡率:一项基于新建立的全国性大规模临床数据库的低位前切除术研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Sep;57(9):1075-81. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000176.
3
Risk-adjusted pathologic margin positivity rate as a quality indicator in rectal cancer surgery.
风险调整后的病理切缘阳性率作为直肠癌手术的质量指标
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):2967-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5334.
4
RAMPing up the quality of rectal cancer surgery.提升直肠癌手术质量。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):2938-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2412.
5
Lost in translation, or overestimating administrative data for outcome control in colorectal surgery.翻译中的迷失,或高估结直肠手术结局控制中的行政数据。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jul;16(7):493-4. doi: 10.1111/codi.12606.
6
National and international guidelines for rectal cancer.直肠癌的国内和国际指南。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Nov;16(11):854-65. doi: 10.1111/codi.12678.
7
Increasing late stage colorectal cancer and rectal cancer mortality demonstrates the need for screening: a population based study in Ireland, 1994-2010.晚期结直肠癌和直肠癌死亡率的上升表明有必要进行筛查:1994 - 2010年爱尔兰的一项基于人群的研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 May 13;14:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-92.
8
Reconciliation of international administrative coding systems for comparison of colorectal surgery outcome.国际行政编码系统的协调用于比较结直肠手术结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jul;16(7):555-61. doi: 10.1111/codi.12624.
9
High complication rate after low anterior resection for mid and high rectal cancer; results of a population-based study.中高位直肠癌前切除术的高并发症率:一项基于人群的研究结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;40(6):692-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.02.234. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
10
Documented quality of care in certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany: German Cancer Society benchmarking report for 2013.德国认证结直肠癌中心的医疗质量记录:德国癌症协会2013年基准报告
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Apr;29(4):511-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1842-x. Epub 2014 Mar 4.