Jannasch Olof, Udelnow Andrej, Wolff Stefanie, Lippert Hans, Mroczkowski Pawel
Department of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Institute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine Ltd., Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:456476. doi: 10.1155/2015/456476. Epub 2015 May 3.
Background. Colorectal cancer remains the second most common cause of death from malignancies, but treatment results show high diversity. Certified bowel cancer centres (BCC) are the basis of a German project for improvement of treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze if certification would enhance short-term outcome in rectal cancer surgery. Material and Methods. This quality assurance study included 8197 patients with rectal cancer treated between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2010. We compared cohorts treated in certified and noncertified hospitals regarding preoperative variables and perioperative outcomes. Outcomes were verified by matched-pair analysis. Results. Patients of noncertified hospitals had higher ASA-scores, higher prevalence of risk factors, more distant metastases, lower tumour localization, lower frequency of pelvic MRI, and higher frequencies of missing values and undetermined TNM classifications (significant differences only). Outcome analysis revealed more general complications in certified hospitals (20.3% versus 17.4%, p = 0.03). Both cohorts did not differ significantly in percentage of R0-resections, intraoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, in-hospital death, and abdominal wall dehiscence. Conclusions. The concept of BCC is a step towards improving the structural and procedural quality. This is a good basis for improving outcome quality but cannot replace it. For a primary surgical disease like rectal cancer a specific, surgery-targeted program is still needed.
背景。结直肠癌仍然是恶性肿瘤导致死亡的第二大常见原因,但治疗结果差异很大。认证肠癌中心(BCC)是德国一项改善治疗项目的基础。本研究的目的是分析认证是否会提高直肠癌手术的短期疗效。材料与方法。这项质量保证研究纳入了2008年1月1日至2010年12月31日期间接受治疗的8197例直肠癌患者。我们比较了在认证医院和非认证医院接受治疗的队列在术前变量和围手术期结果方面的情况。结果通过配对分析进行验证。结果。非认证医院的患者ASA评分更高、危险因素患病率更高、远处转移更多、肿瘤位置更低、盆腔MRI检查频率更低,以及缺失值和未确定TNM分类的频率更高(仅存在显著差异)。结果分析显示认证医院的一般并发症更多(20.3%对17.4%,p = 0.03)。两组在R0切除率、术中并发症、吻合口漏、院内死亡和腹壁裂开百分比方面无显著差异。结论。BCC的理念是朝着改善结构和程序质量迈出的一步。这是提高结果质量的良好基础,但不能替代它。对于像直肠癌这样的原发性外科疾病,仍然需要一个针对手术的特定项目。