Paustian Timothy D, Briggs Amy G, Brennan Robert E, Boury Nancy, Buchner John, Harris Shannon, Horak Rachel E A, Hughes Lee E, Katz-Amburn D Sue, Massimelli Maria J, McDonald Ann H, Primm Todd P, Smith Ann C, Stevens Ann M, Yung Sunny B
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
Beloit College, Beloit, WI 53511.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2017 Oct 5;18(3). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v18i3.1320. eCollection 2017.
If we are to teach effectively, tools are needed to measure student learning. A widely used method for quickly measuring student understanding of core concepts in a discipline is the concept inventory (CI). Using the American Society for Microbiology Curriculum Guidelines (ASMCG) for microbiology, faculty from 11 academic institutions created and validated a new microbiology concept inventory (MCI). The MCI was developed in three phases. In phase one, learning outcomes and fundamental statements from the ASMCG were used to create T/F questions coupled with open responses. In phase two, the 743 responses to MCI 1.0 were examined to find the most common misconceptions, which were used to create distractors for multiple-choice questions. MCI 2.0 was then administered to 1,043 students. The responses of these students were used to create MCI 3.0, a 23-question CI that measures students' understanding of all 27 fundamental statements. MCI 3.0 was found to be reliable, with a Cronbach's alpha score of 0.705 and Ferguson's delta of 0.97. Test item analysis demonstrated good validity and discriminatory power as judged by item difficulty, item discrimination, and point-biserial correlation coefficient. Comparison of pre- and posttest scores showed that microbiology students at 10 institutions showed an increase in understanding of concepts after instruction, except for questions probing metabolism (average normalized learning gain was 0.15). The MCI will enable quantitative analysis of student learning gains in understanding microbiology, help to identify misconceptions, and point toward areas where efforts should be made to develop teaching approaches to overcome them.
如果我们要进行有效的教学,就需要工具来衡量学生的学习情况。一种广泛用于快速衡量学生对某一学科核心概念理解程度的方法是概念清单(CI)。依据美国微生物学会微生物学课程指南(ASMCG),来自11所学术机构的教师创建并验证了一种新的微生物学概念清单(MCI)。MCI分三个阶段开发。在第一阶段,利用ASMCG中的学习成果和基本陈述来创建是非题并配以开放式回答。在第二阶段,对MCI 1.0的743份回答进行分析,找出最常见的误解,这些误解被用于创建多项选择题的干扰项。然后对1043名学生进行MCI 2.0测试。这些学生的回答被用于创建MCI 3.0,这是一个包含23个问题的概念清单,用于衡量学生对所有27条基本陈述的理解。结果发现MCI 3.0具有可靠性,其克朗巴哈系数为0.705,弗格森δ系数为0.97。试题分析表明,从试题难度、试题区分度和点二列相关系数来看,该测试具有良好的效度和区分能力。前后测分数比较显示,除了关于新陈代谢的问题(平均标准化学习增益为0.15)外,10所机构的微生物学专业学生在接受教学后对概念的理解有所提高。MCI将能够对学生在微生物学理解方面的学习增益进行定量分析,有助于识别误解,并指出应努力开发教学方法以克服这些误解的领域。