• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜碎石术与肾盂切开取石术治疗患者术后肾脏结局的比较:一项基于人群的队列研究。

Postoperative Renal Outcomes of Patients Receiving Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Pyelolithotomy: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 2;2018:8582901. doi: 10.1155/2018/8582901. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1155/2018/8582901
PMID:29854800
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5954950/
Abstract

The aim of this population-based cohort study was to explore postoperative renal outcomes of patients receiving pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Data were retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. During the period from Jan 1, 1998, to Dec 31, 2012, there were 2549 and 21654 patients who underwent pyelolithotomy and PCNL, respectively. The postoperative incidence of new diagnosed end stage renal disease (ESRD) was statistically analyzed and compared between the pyelolithotomy and PCNL groups. The perioperative complications of two groups were also analyzed. In comparison to pyelolithotomy, PCNL achieved lower new diagnosed ESRD (1.38% versus 2.28%, = 0.0004). Patients receiving PCNL had significantly higher rates of preoperative hypertension, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, and coronary artery disease. The hospital stay was shorter in PCNL groups compared with pyelolithotomy groups (8.31 days versus 12.59 days, = 0.0006). In conclusion, PCNL contributed to lower rates of new diagnosed ESRD and hospital stay when compared to pyelolithotomy.

摘要

本基于人群的队列研究旨在探讨接受肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)的患者的术后肾脏结局。数据来自台湾全民健康保险研究数据库。1998 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 12 月 31 日期间,分别有 2549 例和 21654 例患者接受了肾盂切开取石术和 PCNL。对两组术后新发终末期肾病(ESRD)的发生率进行了统计学分析和比较。还分析了两组的围手术期并发症。与肾盂切开取石术相比,PCNL 新发 ESRD 的发生率较低(1.38%比 2.28%, = 0.0004)。接受 PCNL 的患者术前高血压、糖尿病、肺部疾病、脑血管疾病和冠状动脉疾病的发生率明显更高。与肾盂切开取石术组相比,PCNL 组的住院时间更短(8.31 天比 12.59 天, = 0.0006)。总之,与肾盂切开取石术相比,PCNL 可降低新发 ESRD 发生率和住院时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d315/5954950/9133e2671a96/BMRI2018-8582901.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d315/5954950/84ec0b288c72/BMRI2018-8582901.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d315/5954950/9133e2671a96/BMRI2018-8582901.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d315/5954950/84ec0b288c72/BMRI2018-8582901.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d315/5954950/9133e2671a96/BMRI2018-8582901.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Postoperative Renal Outcomes of Patients Receiving Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Pyelolithotomy: A Population-Based Cohort Study.经皮肾镜碎石术与肾盂切开取石术治疗患者术后肾脏结局的比较:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 2;2018:8582901. doi: 10.1155/2018/8582901. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with large renal pelvic stones: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大肾盂结石患者的安全性和有效性比较:一项荟萃分析
J Investig Med. 2016 Aug;64(6):1134-42. doi: 10.1136/jim-2015-000053. Epub 2016 May 24.
3
Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy.大型肾结石的治疗:腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术的对比
BMC Urol. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7.
4
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾盂大结石的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):888-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
5
Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in spinal cord injury patients as compared to a matched cohort.与匹配队列相比,脊髓损伤患者经皮肾镜取石术的结果。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Oct;45(5):501-506. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0958-6. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
6
Randomized controlled trial comparing retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi: a pilot study.随机对照试验比较后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型肾盂结石:一项初步研究。
J Endourol. 2014 Aug;28(8):946-50. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0064. Epub 2014 May 28.
7
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy as a monotherapy for the management of intermediate-sized renal pelvic stones.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术作为治疗中等大小肾盂结石的单一疗法。
Urol Ann. 2018 Jul-Sep;10(3):254-257. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_80_17.
8
Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾盂结石患者的安全性和有效性比较:一项随机临床试验
Urol J. 2014 Nov 30;11(6):1932-7.
9
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience.无侧卧位改良仰卧位下微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:单中心经验。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):585-589. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0966-1. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
10
Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20 mm.逆行肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径为 15 至 20 毫米的下极肾结石的比较。
J Endourol. 2011 Jul;25(7):1131-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0737. Epub 2011 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
[Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones in elderly patients: Meta-analysis of results and complications].老年患者肾结石的经皮肾镜取石术:结果与并发症的Meta分析
Prog Urol. 2017 Feb;27(2):58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
2
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review.经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)的关键评价。
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt D):660-664. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.028. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
3
Hospital-Based Analysis of Trends and Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Pyelolithotomy.
基于医院的肾盂切开取石术患者的趋势和结果分析
J Endourol. 2017 Jan;31(1):78-84. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0672. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
Comparison of the risk of de novo cardiovascular disease between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease.终末期肾病患者中血液透析与腹膜透析新发心血管疾病风险的比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;218:219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.036. Epub 2016 May 14.
5
The management of large staghorn renal stones by percutaneous versus laparoscopic versus open nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and functional outcome.经皮肾镜取石术、腹腔镜肾切开取石术与开放性肾切开取石术治疗大型鹿角形肾结石的比较:临床疗效和功能结果的对比分析
Urolithiasis. 2016 Nov;44(6):551-557. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0877-6. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
Comparison of laparoscopic stone surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large upper urinary stones: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路大结石的比较:一项荟萃分析
Urolithiasis. 2016 Nov;44(6):479-490. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0862-0. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
7
Evaluation of Renal Function after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy-Does the Number of Percutaneous Access Tracts Matter?经皮肾镜碎石取石术后肾功能评估——经皮肾穿刺通道数量有影响吗?
J Urol. 2016 Jul;196(1):131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.121. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
8
Prognostic Benefits of Carvedilol, Bisoprolol, and Metoprolol Controlled Release/Extended Release in Hemodialysis Patients with Heart Failure: A 10-Year Cohort.卡维地洛、比索洛尔和美托洛尔控释/缓释制剂对心力衰竭血液透析患者的预后益处:一项为期10年的队列研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jan 6;5(1):e002584. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002584.
9
Percutaneous Renal Access: Surgical Factors Involved in the Acute Reduction of Renal Function.经皮肾穿刺通路:急性肾功能减退相关的手术因素
J Endourol. 2016 Feb;30(2):178-83. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0542. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
10
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: An emerging tool for complex staghorn nephrolithiasis in high-risk patients.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术:治疗高危患者复杂性鹿角形肾结石的一种新兴手段。
Arab J Urol. 2015 Jun;13(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 26.