• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾盂大结石的比较:一项荟萃分析。

Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital, School of Public Health, State Key Laboratory of Virology (YG), Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):888-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092
PMID:23454154
Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for solitary renal pelvic calculi larger than 2 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed®, EMBASE®, The Cochrane Library and the Web of Knowledge(SM) databases up to November 9, 2012 for relevant published studies. After data extraction and quality assessment, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1.

RESULTS

We identified 7 trials in a total of 176 and 187 patients treated with laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy, respectively. Operative time and hospital stay were 50.62 minutes and 0.66 days shorter in the nephrolithotomy group (p <0.0001 and 0.04, respectively). Patients in the laparoscopic group benefited from a lesser decrease in hemoglobin (OR -1.00, 95% CI -1.77--0.23), less postoperative fever (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.72), a lower incidence of bleeding (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.85) and a higher stone-free rate (OR 4.85, 95% CI 1.59-14.82). Sensitivity analysis indicated that all results were stable except the stone-free rate showed no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.09-1.17). No publication bias was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy are effective and safe for large renal pelvic calculi but laparoscopic pyelolithotomy seems to be more advantageous. However, given the inherent limitations of the included studies, results must be further confirmed in high quality randomized, controlled trials.

摘要

目的

我们评估了腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术和经皮肾镜取石术作为大于 2cm 的孤立肾盂结石的手术治疗方法的有效性和安全性。

材料和方法

我们检索了 PubMed®、EMBASE®、The Cochrane Library 和 Web of Knowledge(SM) 数据库,以获取截至 2012 年 11 月 9 日的相关已发表研究。在提取数据和评估质量后,我们使用 RevMan 5.1 进行了荟萃分析。

结果

我们共确定了 7 项研究,共有 176 例和 187 例患者分别接受了腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗。经皮肾镜取石术组的手术时间和住院时间分别缩短了 50.62 分钟和 0.66 天(p<0.0001 和 0.04)。腹腔镜组患者的血红蛋白下降幅度较小(OR-1.00,95%CI-1.77-0.23),术后发热较少(OR 0.24,95%CI 0.08-0.72),出血发生率较低(OR 0.29,95%CI 0.10-0.85),结石清除率较高(OR 4.85,95%CI 1.59-14.82)。敏感性分析表明,除结石清除率外,所有结果均稳定,两组间无统计学差异(OR 0.33,95%CI 0.09-1.17)。未发现发表偏倚。

结论

现有证据表明,腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术和经皮肾镜取石术对大的肾盂结石是有效且安全的,但腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术似乎更有优势。然而,鉴于纳入研究的固有局限性,这些结果必须在高质量的随机对照试验中进一步确认。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾盂大结石的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):888-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
2
Randomized controlled trial comparing retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi: a pilot study.随机对照试验比较后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型肾盂结石:一项初步研究。
J Endourol. 2014 Aug;28(8):946-50. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0064. Epub 2014 May 28.
3
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal pelvic calculi (diameter >2 cm): a meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型肾盂结石(直径>2厘米)的Meta分析
Acta Chir Belg. 2016 Dec;116(6):346-356. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2016.1181312. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
4
Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾盂结石患者的安全性和有效性比较:一项随机临床试验
Urol J. 2014 Nov 30;11(6):1932-7.
5
Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with large renal pelvic stones: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大肾盂结石患者的安全性和有效性比较:一项荟萃分析
J Investig Med. 2016 Aug;64(6):1134-42. doi: 10.1136/jim-2015-000053. Epub 2016 May 24.
6
Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy.大型肾结石的治疗:腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术的对比
BMC Urol. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7.
7
Retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy: a minimally invasive alternative for the management of large renal pelvic stone.后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术:一种治疗大型肾盂结石的微创替代方法。
Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):123-4;discussion 124. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.18.
8
Robotic nephrolithotomy and pyelolithotomy with utilization of the robotic ultrasound probe.机器人辅助肾及肾盂切开取石术并联合应用机器人超声探头。
Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):125-6; discussion 126. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.19.
9
Perioperative and long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single-center randomized controlled trial.后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形结石的围手术期和长期结果:一项单中心随机对照试验。
World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1441-1447. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2526-x. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
Does previous extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy affect the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?既往体外冲击波碎石术是否会影响经皮肾镜取石术的操作及结果?
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):663-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.016. Epub 2008 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Modified amplatz sheath with suction versus standard sheath in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating large renal stones > 2 cm: a prospective randomized trial.改良带抽吸功能的安普拉斯鞘与标准鞘用于经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径>2 cm的大型肾结石:一项前瞻性随机试验
World J Urol. 2025 Apr 25;43(1):248. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05489-5.
2
Needle nephroscope combined with ureteroscope via a single standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy channel for the treatment of complex non-obstructing renal stones.经单一标准经皮肾镜通道联合输尿管镜的针状肾镜治疗复杂非梗阻性肾结石
Front Surg. 2025 Mar 25;12:1573548. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1573548. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparative analysis of retro vs. transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for large renal stones.
后腹腔镜与经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术治疗大肾结石的对比分析。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Oct 9;52(1):137. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01640-w.
4
Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy; a single surgeon's experience.腹膜后与经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术; 单外科医生的经验。
World J Urol. 2024 Oct 3;42(1):559. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05265-x.
5
Robotic pyelolithotomy for treating large renal stone disease: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.机器人肾盂切开取石术治疗大肾结石病:系统评价和单臂荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Aug 9;18(1):316. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02064-9.
6
The Saudi urological association guidelines on urolithiasis.沙特泌尿外科协会尿路结石指南。
Urol Ann. 2024 Jan-Mar;16(1):1-27. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_120_23. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
7
Place of urolithiasis in the spectrum of urological pathologies, practices and use of endourological procedures in the management of calculi of the upper urinary tract: results of a survey of referral centres in Africa.尿路结石在泌尿外科学中的位置,腔内泌尿外科技术在处理上尿路结石中的应用和实践:非洲转诊中心调查结果。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Jan 12;52(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01519-2.
8
Laparoscopic pyelotomy combined with ultrasonic lithotripsy via a nephroscope for the treatment of complex renal stones.经皮肾镜超声碎石取石术联合腹腔镜肾盂切开术治疗复杂性肾结石。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Jan 8;52(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01522-7.
9
A comparative study of morbidity between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for renal pelvic calculus.经皮肾镜取石术与腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术治疗肾盂结石的发病率比较研究
Urol Ann. 2021 Jan-Mar;13(1):56-61. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_20_20. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
10
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型肾结石的疗效及安全性:一项荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2021 Jan;49(1):300060520983136. doi: 10.1177/0300060520983136.