Ellersgaard Ditte, Jessica Plessen Kerstin, Richardt Jepsen Jens, Soeborg Spang Katrine, Hemager Nicoline, Klee Burton Birgitte, Jerlang Christiani Camilla, Gregersen Maja, Søndergaard Anne, Uddin Md Jamal, Poulsen Gry, Greve Aja, Gantriis Ditte, Mors Ole, Nordentoft Merete, Elgaard Thorup Anne Amalie
Mental Health Services - Capital Region of Denmark, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH), Aarhus, Denmark.
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):210-219. doi: 10.1002/wps.20527.
This study aimed to compare the psychopathological profiles of children at familial high risk of schizophrenia spectrum psychosis (FHR-SZ) or bipolar disorder (FHR-BP) with population-based controls. We used Danish nationwide registers to retrieve a cohort of 522 seven-year-old children of parents with schizophrenia spectrum psychosis (N=202), bipolar disorder (N=120) or none of these disorders (N=200). Psychopathology was assessed by reports from multiple informants, including children, parents and teachers. Lifetime DSM-IV diagnoses were ascertained by blinded raters through the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children. The dimensional assessment of psychopathology was performed by the Child Behavior Checklist, the Teacher's Report Form, a modified version of the ADHD-Rating Scale, the Test Observation Form, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children. Current level of functioning was evaluated using the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). The prevalence of lifetime psychiatric diagnoses was significantly higher in both FHR-SZ children (38.7%, odds ratio, OR=3.5, 95% confidence interval, CI: 2.2-5.7, p < 0.001) and FHR-BP children (35.6%, OR=3.1, 95% CI: 1.8-5.3, p < 0.001) compared with controls (15.2%). FHR-SZ children displayed significantly more dimensional psychopathology on all scales and subscales compared with controls except for the Anxious subscale of the Test Observation Form. FHR-BP children showed higher levels of dimensional psychopathology on several scales and subscales compared with controls, but lower levels compared with FHR-SZ children. Level of functioning was lower in both FHR-SZ children (CGAS mean score = 68.2; 95% CI: 66.3-70.2, p < 0.0001) and FHR-BP children (73.7; 95% CI: 71.2-76.3, p < 0.05) compared with controls (77.9; 95% CI: 75.9-79.9). In conclusion, already at the age of seven, FHR-SZ and FHR-BP children show a higher prevalence of a broad spectrum of categorical and dimensional psychopathology compared with controls. These results emphasize the need for developing early intervention strategies towards this vulnerable group of children.
本研究旨在比较精神分裂症谱系精神病(FHR-SZ)或双相情感障碍(FHR-BP)家族高风险儿童与基于人群的对照组儿童的心理病理学特征。我们利用丹麦全国登记系统检索出一个队列,其中包括522名7岁儿童,他们的父母患有精神分裂症谱系精神病(N=202)、双相情感障碍(N=120)或无上述疾病(N=200)。心理病理学通过包括儿童、父母和教师在内的多名信息提供者的报告进行评估。终生的DSM-IV诊断由盲法评分者通过学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症检查表确定。心理病理学的维度评估通过儿童行为量表、教师报告表、注意缺陷多动障碍评定量表的修改版、测试观察表以及儿童状态-特质焦虑量表进行。使用儿童总体评估量表(CGAS)评估当前的功能水平。与对照组(15.2%)相比,FHR-SZ儿童(38.7%,优势比,OR=3.5,95%置信区间,CI:2.2-5.7,p<0.001)和FHR-BP儿童(35.6%,OR=3.1,95%CI:1.8-5.3,p<0.001)终生精神疾病诊断的患病率显著更高。与对照组相比,FHR-SZ儿童在所有量表和子量表上均表现出显著更多的维度心理病理学特征,但测试观察表的焦虑子量表除外。与对照组相比,FHR-BP儿童在几个量表和子量表上表现出更高水平的维度心理病理学特征,但与FHR-SZ儿童相比水平较低。与对照组(77.9;95%CI:75.9-79.9)相比,FHR-SZ儿童(CGAS平均得分=68.2;95%CI:66.3-70.2,p<0.0001)和FHR-BP儿童(73.7;95%CI:71.2-76.3,p<0.05)的功能水平较低。总之,在7岁时,FHR-SZ和FHR-BP儿童与对照组相比,在广泛的类别和维度心理病理学方面患病率更高。这些结果强调了针对这一脆弱儿童群体制定早期干预策略的必要性。