International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0197360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197360. eCollection 2018.
To assess the Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) access and appropriateness of people with disabilities compared to those without, in Guatemala.
A case-control study was conducted, nested within a national survey. The study included 707 people with disabilities, and 465 age- and sex-matched controls without disabilities. Participants reported on WASH access at the household and individual level. A sub-set of 121 cases and 104 controls completed a newly designed, in-depth WASH questionnaire.
Households including people with disabilities were more likely to use an improved sanitation facility compared to control households (age-sex-adjusted OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.5), but otherwise there were no differences in WASH access at the household level. At the individual level, people with disabilities reported greater difficulties in relation to sanitation (mean score 26.2, SD 26.5) and hygiene access and quality (mean 30.7, SD 24.2) compared to those without disabilities (15.5, 21.7, p<0.001; 22.4, 19.1, p<0.01). There were no differences in different aspects of water collection between people with and without disabilities in this context where over 85% of participants had water piped into their dwelling. Among people with disabilities, older adults were more likely to experience difficulties in hygiene and sanitation than younger people with disabilities.
People with disabilities in Guatemala experience greater difficulties in accessing sanitation facilities and practicing hygienic behaviours than their peers without disabilities. More data collection is needed using detailed tools to detect these differences, highlight which interventions are needed, and to allow assessment of their effectiveness.
评估危地马拉残疾人和非残疾人在获得水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)服务方面的情况以及这些服务的适宜性。
采用病例对照嵌套式研究设计,纳入了一项全国性调查。研究共纳入了 707 名残疾人和 465 名年龄和性别相匹配的非残疾对照者。参与者报告了家庭和个人层面的 WASH 服务获取情况。其中,有 121 名病例和 104 名对照完成了一份新设计的 WASH 深度调查问卷。
与对照家庭相比,包括残疾人的家庭更有可能使用改良的卫生设施(年龄-性别校正 OR:1.7,95%CI 1.3-2.5),但家庭层面的 WASH 服务获取情况没有差异。在个人层面,与非残疾人相比,残疾人报告在卫生设施(平均得分 26.2,SD 26.5)和个人卫生获取和质量(平均 30.7,SD 24.2)方面存在更大的困难(p<0.001;p<0.01)。在这一情境下,超过 85%的参与者的住所都接入了水管,残疾人和非残疾人在不同的水收集方面没有差异。在残疾人群体中,年龄较大的成年人比年龄较小的残疾人士更有可能在卫生和环境卫生方面遇到困难。
危地马拉的残疾人在获得卫生设施和实施卫生行为方面比非残疾同龄人面临更大的困难。需要使用详细的工具收集更多的数据来发现这些差异,确定需要采取哪些干预措施,并评估其有效性。