Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, The Netherlands.
Health Informatics J. 2019 Dec;25(4):1498-1510. doi: 10.1177/1460458218779110. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
Implementation of patient's decision aids in routine clinical care is generally low. This study evaluated uptake and usage of a novel Dutch web-based prostate cancer treatment decision aid within the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial. From an estimated total patient sample of 1006 patients, 351 received a decision aid (35% implementation rate; hospital ranges 16%-84%). After receipt of the decision aid, most patients accessed the decision aid, utilized most functions, although not completely, and discussed the decision aid summary in a subsequent consultation with their care provider. Including nurses for dissemination of decision aids seemed to positively affect decision aid uptake. Once received, patients seemed able to use the decision aid and engage in shared decision-making as intended; however, decision aid uptake and complete usage of all decision aid components should be further improved. Prior to the diagnosis consultation, handing out of the decision aid should be prepared.
在常规临床护理中,患者决策辅助工具的实施率通常较低。本研究评估了在前列腺癌患者以中心为导向的护理试验中,一种新型荷兰网络版前列腺癌治疗决策辅助工具的使用情况。在估计的总共 1006 名患者中,有 351 名患者(实施率为 35%;医院范围为 16%-84%)收到了决策辅助工具。在收到决策辅助工具后,大多数患者都访问了决策辅助工具,虽然不是完全地,但使用了大多数功能,并在随后与护理提供者的咨询中讨论了决策辅助工具的总结。让护士传播决策辅助工具似乎会积极影响决策辅助工具的使用。一旦收到,患者似乎能够使用决策辅助工具并按照预期进行共同决策;然而,决策辅助工具的使用和所有决策辅助工具组件的完全使用应该进一步改进。在诊断咨询之前,应该准备好发放决策辅助工具。