Institute of Biomechanics, Graz University of Technology, Austria.
Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University Graz, Austria.
Acta Biomater. 2018 Jul 15;75:235-252. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.043. Epub 2018 May 31.
Peripheral vascular trauma due to injuries of the upper and lower limbs are life-threatening, and their treatment require rapid diagnosis and highly-qualified surgical procedures. Experienced surgeons have recognized that subclavian arteries, affected by injuries of the upper limbs, require a more careful handling due to fragility than common iliac arteries, which are may be affected by injures of the lower limbs. We investigated these two artery types with comparable diameter to evaluate the differences in the biomechanical properties between subclavian and iliac arteries. Human subclavian and common iliac arteries of 14 donors either from the right or the left side (age: 63 yrs, SD: 19,9 female and 5 male) were investigated. Extension-inflation-torsion experiments at different axial strains (0-20%), transmural pressures (0-200 mmHg) and torsion (±25°) on preconditioned arterial tubes were performed. Residual stresses in both circumferential and axial direction were determined. Additionally, the microstructure of the tissues was determined via second-harmonic generation imaging and by histological investigations. At physiological conditions (p=13.3 kPa, λ=1.1) common iliac arteries revealed higher Cauchy stresses in circumferential and axial directions but a more compliant response in the circumferential direction than subclavian arteries. Both arteries showed distinct stiffer behavior in circumferential than in axial direction. Circumferential stiffness of common iliac arteries at physiological conditions increased significantly with aging (r=-0.67,p=0.02). The median inversion stretches, where the axial force is basically independent of the transmural pressure, were determined to be 1.05 for subclavian arteries and 1.11 for common iliac arteries. Both arteries exhibited increased torsional stiffness, when either axial prestretch or inflation pressure was increased. Residual stresses in the circumferential direction were significantly lower for subclavian arteries than for common iliac arteries at measurements after 30 min (p=0.05) and 16hrs (p=0.01). Investigations of the collagen microstructure revealed different collagen fiber orientations and dispersions in subclavian and iliac arteries. The difference in the collagen microstructure revealed further that the adventitia seems to contribute significantly to the passive mechanical response of the tested arteries at physiological loadings. Histological investigations indicated pronounced thickened intimal layers in subclavian and common iliac arteries, with a thickness comparable to the adventitial layer. In conclusion, we obtained biomechanical differences between subclavian and common iliac arteries, which possibly resulted from their different mechanical loadings/environments and respective in vivo movements caused by their anatomical locations. The biomechanical differences explored in this study are well reflected by the microstructure of the collagen and the histology of the investigated arteries, and the results can improve trauma patient care and endovascular implant design.
During surgical interventions surgeons experienced that subclavian arteries (SAs) supplying the upper extremities, appear more fragile and prone to damage during surgical repair than common iliac arteries (CIAs), supplying the lower extremities. To investigate this difference in a systematic way the aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of these two arteries from the same donors in terms of geometry, extension-inflation-torsion behavior, residual stresses, microstructure, and histology. In regard to cardiovascular medicine the material behavior of aged human arteries is of crucial interest. Moreover, the investigation of SA is important as it can help to improve surgical procedures at this challenging location. Over the long-term it might well be of value in the construction of artificial arteries for substituting native arteries. In addition, the analysis of mechanical stresses can improve design and material choice for endovascular implants to optimize long-term implant function.
探讨上肢供血的锁骨下动脉(subclavian arteries,SAs)与下肢供血的髂总动脉(common iliac arteries,CIAs)在生物力学性能方面的差异,评估两种动脉的组织学和微观结构特征。
对 14 名供体(年龄:63 岁,标准差:19 岁,女性 5 名,男性 5 名)的右侧和左侧 SAs 和 CIA 进行体外研究。对预适应的动脉管进行不同轴向应变(0-20%)、跨壁压力(0-200mmHg)和扭转(±25°)的扩张-膨胀-扭转实验。测定在两个圆周和轴向方向上的残余应力。此外,通过二次谐波产生成像和组织学研究来确定组织的微观结构。
在生理条件(p=13.3kPa,λ=1.1)下,CIA 在圆周和轴向方向上表现出更高的 Cauchy 应力,但在圆周方向上的顺应性比 SA 更好。两种动脉在圆周方向上的刚度明显大于轴向方向。在生理条件下,CIA 的圆周方向的弹性显著增加,与年龄呈负相关(r=-0.67,p=0.02)。确定轴向力基本独立于跨壁压力的中值反转拉伸值为 1.05 用于 SA,1.11 用于 CIA。当轴向预拉伸或充气压力增加时,两种动脉的扭转刚度均增加。在测量后 30min(p=0.05)和 16 小时(p=0.01)时,SA 的圆周方向残余应力明显低于 CIA。
组织学研究表明,SA 和 CIA 的胶原纤维取向和分布存在差异。胶原组织结构的差异进一步表明,在生理负荷下,测试动脉的被动力学反应可能主要由其外膜贡献。组织学研究表明,SA 和 CIA 的内膜明显增厚,厚度与外膜相当。
我们获得了 SA 和 CIA 之间的生物力学差异,这可能是由于它们在不同的机械载荷/环境下以及由于它们的解剖位置而导致的各自的体内运动所致。研究中探索的生物力学差异很好地反映在胶原的微观结构和研究动脉的组织学中,研究结果可以改善创伤患者的护理和血管内植入物的设计。