Furlan Alessandro, Bayram Ersin, Thangasamy Senthur, Barley Dale, Dasyam Anil
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and School of Medicine, 200 Lothrop Street, 15213 Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Global MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Houston, TX, USA.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Oct;52:131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
The aim of this study was to assess changes in acquisition time, image quality and evaluation of pancreatic cysts when applying CS to a 3D MRCP sequence. Thirty subjects (17F; 13M) undergoing MRCP for evaluation of pancreatic cyst(s) were prospectively recruited and underwent 3D MRCP and CS 3D MRCP (CS factor = 2) on a 3T scanner. The acquisition time was recorded. Two experienced radiologists independently recorded quality of the images, presence of artifacts, visualization of the main pancreatic duct, bile ducts and index pancreatic cyst using a five-point scale. Presence of mural nodules and septations in the cyst, size of the cyst and caliber of the main pancreatic duct were also recorded. A paired sample t-test was used to compare the acquisition time of 3D MRCP and CS 3D MRCP. Image quality metrics and visualization of cyst features were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test. The mean acquisition time of CS-3D-MRCP (150 ± 63 s) was significantly lower than that of 3D-MRCP (317 ± 104 s; P < 0.001). The median score of overall quality (reader 1, 3.7 ± 1.0 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.11; reader 2, 3.8 ± 1.0 vs. 3.7 ± 1.1, P = 0.36), artifacts and visualization of the bile ducts were not significantly different between 3D-MRCP and CS-3D-MRCP. There was no significant difference in the visualization score of the index pancreatic cyst (reader 1, 4.2 ± 0.9 vs. 4.1 ± 0.9, P = 0.42; reader 2, 4.2 ± 0.4 vs. 4.0 ± 0.7, P = 0.27) and no difference in the assessment of cyst features. Applying CS to 3D-MRCP yields a two-fold reduction in acquisition time with comparable image quality and visualization of key pancreatic cyst features.
本研究的目的是评估在3D磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)序列中应用压缩感知(CS)时采集时间、图像质量的变化以及胰腺囊肿的评估情况。前瞻性招募了30名接受MRCP以评估胰腺囊肿的受试者(17名女性;13名男性),并在3T扫描仪上进行了3D MRCP和CS 3D MRCP(CS因子 = 2)检查。记录采集时间。两名经验丰富的放射科医生使用五点量表独立记录图像质量、伪影的存在情况、主胰管、胆管和索引胰腺囊肿的可视化情况。还记录了囊肿内壁结节和分隔的存在情况、囊肿大小以及主胰管的管径。采用配对样本t检验比较3D MRCP和CS 3D MRCP的采集时间。图像质量指标和囊肿特征的可视化情况采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和McNemar检验进行比较。CS-3D-MRCP的平均采集时间(150 ± 63秒)显著低于3D-MRCP(317 ± 104秒;P < 0.001)。3D-MRCP和CS-3D-MRCP在总体质量(读者1,3.7 ± 1.0 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1,P = 0.11;读者2,3.8 ± 1.0 vs. 3.7 ± 1.1,P = 0.36)、伪影以及胆管可视化方面的中位数评分无显著差异。索引胰腺囊肿的可视化评分无显著差异(读者1,4.2 ± 0.9 vs. 4.1 ± 0.9,P = 0.42;读者2,4.2 ± 0.4 vs. 4.0 ± 0.7,P = 0.27),囊肿特征评估也无差异。在3D-MRCP中应用CS可使采集时间减少一半,同时图像质量和关键胰腺囊肿特征的可视化效果相当。