• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进展反馈是否能提高团体心理治疗的效果?

Does progress feedback enhance the outcome of group psychotherapy?

机构信息

GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord.

Clinical Psychology Unit, Leiden University.

出版信息

Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):151-163. doi: 10.1037/pst0000164.

DOI:10.1037/pst0000164
PMID:29863395
Abstract

There is evidence that progress feedback combined with a clinical support tool (CST) improves treatment outcome in individual psychotherapy. This study examined the effect of feedback in combination with a CST in outpatient group psychotherapy. A prospective cohort study was performed with patients meeting diagnostic criteria for a major depressive disorder or an anxiety disorder. Patients received cognitive-behavioral group therapy or interpersonal group therapy and completed the Outcome Questionnaire-45 on a session by session basis. In the control cohort (N = 132), no feedback was provided. In the feedback cohort (N = 137), patients and clinicians received feedback on the treatment progress based on the Outcome Questionnaire-45. If a patient was deteriorating as compared with the start of treatment or the previous session, the CST was offered. Both cohorts showed a significant decrease in symptoms during therapy, but no significant differences existed on treatment outcome. The number of sessions was significantly lower in the feedback cohort. The results suggest that feedback in outpatient group psychotherapy does not improve outcomes but that fewer sessions may be sufficient to obtain outcomes similar to treatment as usual. More research with the use of progress feedback in outpatient group therapy is needed, especially with CSTs. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

有证据表明,进展反馈结合临床支持工具(CST)可改善个体心理治疗的治疗效果。本研究考察了反馈结合 CST 在门诊团体心理治疗中的效果。采用符合主要抑郁障碍或焦虑障碍诊断标准的患者进行前瞻性队列研究。患者接受认知行为团体治疗或人际团体治疗,并在每一次治疗中完成《症状自评量表-45》。在对照组(N=132)中,不提供反馈。在反馈组(N=137)中,根据《症状自评量表-45》,患者和临床医生会收到关于治疗进展的反馈。如果与治疗开始或前一次治疗相比,患者病情恶化,则会提供 CST。两个队列在治疗过程中症状均显著减轻,但治疗结果无显著差异。反馈组的治疗次数明显减少。结果表明,门诊团体心理治疗中的反馈并不会改善治疗效果,但可能只需较少的治疗次数即可获得与常规治疗相似的效果。需要更多使用进展反馈的门诊团体治疗研究,特别是 CST 的研究。

相似文献

1
Does progress feedback enhance the outcome of group psychotherapy?进展反馈是否能提高团体心理治疗的效果?
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):151-163. doi: 10.1037/pst0000164.
2
The effects of relationship and progress feedback in group psychotherapy using the Group Questionnaire and Outcome Questionnaire-45: A randomized clinical trial.使用团体问卷和结果问卷-45 在团体心理治疗中关系和进展反馈的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):116-131. doi: 10.1037/pst0000133.
3
How to customize a bona fide psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder? A two-arms, patient blinded, ABAB crossed-therapist randomized clinical implementation trial design [IMPLEMENT 2.0].如何为广泛性焦虑障碍定制真正的心理治疗?一项双臂、患者盲法、ABAB 交叉治疗师随机临床实施试验设计[IMPLEMENT 2.0]。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1666-2.
4
The influence of comorbid anxiety on the effectiveness of Cognitive Therapy and Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder.共病焦虑对认知疗法和人际心理治疗治疗重度抑郁症疗效的影响。
J Affect Disord. 2018 May;232:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
5
The effects of progress monitoring on subsequent readmission to psychiatric care: a six-month follow-up.进展监测对随后精神科再入院的影响:一项为期六个月的随访。
J Affect Disord. 2012 Mar;137(1-3):113-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
6
Group cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: treatment outcome and long-term follow-up.广泛性焦虑症的团体认知行为疗法:治疗结果及长期随访
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Aug;71(4):821-5. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.71.4.821.
7
Progress monitoring and feedback in psychiatric care reduces depressive symptoms.精神科护理中的进展监测和反馈可减少抑郁症状。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Dec;127(1-3):139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
8
Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of personalized prediction and adaptation tools on treatment outcome in outpatient psychotherapy: study protocol.评估个性化预测与适应工具对门诊心理治疗治疗结果影响的随机对照试验:研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 24;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1464-2.
9
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder with integrations from interpersonal and experiential therapies.将人际关系疗法和体验疗法融入其中的广泛性焦虑症认知行为疗法。
CNS Spectr. 2003 May;8(5):382-9. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900018642.
10
Feedback in group psychotherapy for eating disorders: A randomized clinical trial.团体心理治疗中进食障碍的反馈:一项随机临床试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 May;85(5):484-494. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000173. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Dose-Response Effects of MittEcho, a Measurement Feedback System, in an Indicated Mental Health Intervention for Children in Municipal and School Services in Norway.MittEcho(一种测量反馈系统)在挪威市政和学校服务机构针对儿童的定向心理健康干预中的剂量反应效应。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jan;52(1):223-240. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01389-9. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Renewed Feedback-Informed Group Treatment for Patients with Anxiety and Depressive Disorders.针对焦虑症和抑郁症患者的基于反馈的强化团体治疗
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jan;52(1):88-105. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01338-y. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
3
Patients' and Therapists' Experiences of Standardized Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Needs for a Personalized Approach.
患者和治疗师对标准化团体认知行为疗法的体验:对个性化方法的需求。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Sep;51(5):617-633. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01301-x. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
4
The first session is the one that counts: An exploratory study of therapeutic alliance.第一次治疗至关重要:一项关于治疗联盟的探索性研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 15;13:1016963. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016963. eCollection 2022.
5
The feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a feedback-informed group treatment (FIGT) tool for patients with anxiety or depressive disorders.一种针对焦虑或抑郁障碍患者的基于反馈的团体治疗(FIGT)工具的可行性、可接受性和有效性。
Res Psychother. 2022 Sep 19;25(3):647. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2022.647.