Haug Ida Mari, Neumer Simon-Peter, Handegård Bjørn Helge, Lisøy Carina, Rasmussen Lene-Mari P, Bania Elisabeth Valmyr, Adolfsen Frode, Patras Joshua
Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health and Child Welfare, Northern Norway, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Sykehusvegen 44, Tromsø, 9019, Norway.
Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jan;52(1):223-240. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01389-9. Epub 2024 May 29.
Including routine client feedback can increase the effectiveness of mental health interventions for children, especially when implemented as intended. Rate of implementation, or dose, of such feedback interventions has been shown to moderate results in some studies. Variation in implementation and use of client feedback may also contribute to the mixed results observed within the feedback literature. This study evaluates dose-response associations of client feedback using a novel Measurement Feedback System (MFS) within an indicated group intervention. The primary aim was to determine whether the rate of MFS implementation predicts symptom reduction in anxiety and depression among school-aged children. The secondary aim was to assess whether the rate of MFS implementation influences children's satisfaction with the group intervention or their dropout rates. Data were collected via a randomized factorial study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04263558) across 58 primary schools in Norway. Children aged 8 to 12 years (N = 701) participated in a group-based, transdiagnostic intervention targeting elevated symptoms of anxiety or depression. Half of the child groups also received the feedback intervention using the MittEcho MFS. Group leaders (N = 83), recruited locally, facilitated the interventions. The MFS dose was measured using the Implementation Index, which combines the use of MFS by both children and providers (group leaders) into a single dose variable. Results showed no significant additional effect of dose of MFS on change in depression or anxiety scores, on user satisfaction with the intervention or on intervention dropout. The discussion addresses potential reasons for these non-significant findings and implications for MFS implementation in preventive, group-based interventions in school settings.
纳入常规的客户反馈可以提高针对儿童的心理健康干预措施的有效性,尤其是在按预期实施时。在一些研究中,此类反馈干预措施的实施率或剂量已被证明会影响结果。客户反馈的实施和使用方式的差异也可能导致反馈文献中观察到的结果参差不齐。本研究在一项针对特定群体的干预措施中,使用一种新颖的测量反馈系统(MFS)评估客户反馈的剂量反应关联。主要目的是确定MFS的实施率是否能预测学龄儿童焦虑和抑郁症状的减轻。次要目的是评估MFS的实施率是否会影响儿童对团体干预的满意度或他们的退出率。数据是通过一项随机析因研究(clinicaltrials.gov NCT04263558)在挪威的58所小学收集的。8至12岁的儿童(N = 701)参与了一项基于团体的跨诊断干预措施,该措施针对焦虑或抑郁症状的加重。一半的儿童组还使用MittEcho MFS接受了反馈干预。当地招募的团体领导者(N = 83)协助实施干预措施。MFS剂量使用实施指数进行测量,该指数将儿童和提供者(团体领导者)对MFS的使用合并为一个单一的剂量变量。结果显示,MFS剂量对抑郁或焦虑评分的变化、用户对干预措施的满意度或干预措施的退出率没有显著的额外影响。讨论部分阐述了这些无显著结果的潜在原因以及在学校环境中基于团体的预防性干预措施中实施MFS的意义。