Suppr超能文献

苏格兰正畸同行评审项目:苏格兰正畸专科医生的治疗结果与记录保存标准

The Scottish Orthodontic Peer Review project: the outcome of treatment and standard of record keeping by orthodontic specialist practitioners in Scotland.

作者信息

Isherwood Grant, Pencovich Ross, Burnside Girvan, Miller Simon

机构信息

a Orthodontics , Liverpool University Dental Hospital , Liverpool , UK.

b Restorative Dentistry , Aberdeen Dental Hospital , Aberdeen , UK.

出版信息

J Orthod. 2018 Sep;45(3):176-185. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2018.1467653. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Assess occlusal outcomes of treatment and clinical record keeping in specialist practice in Scotland.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Specialist practices in Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

Specialist orthodontists in Scotland.

METHODS

Every specialist practitioner in Scotland (51) was invited to take part in the peer review project with 38 (76%) enrolled. Scotland was split into four geographical areas, and each practitioner matched with a colleague from the same area. Practitioners took one day to visit their colleague and score 30 consecutively treated NHS cases using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. They also assessed the quality of the records taken. Practitioners then swapped roles and assessed their partner's occlusal outcomes and records.

RESULTS

The mean pretreatment PAR score was 28.6 (SD 3.5). Mean posttreatment PAR score was 3.5 (SD 1.2). Mean reduction in PAR score was 25.1 (SD 3.8). Mean percentage PAR score reduction was 87.7% (SD 3.7%). Overall record keeping scores were written records 100%, study models 99.5%, Orthopantomogram radiograph 99.2%, photographs 86.3%, medical history 75% and consent 40.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Occlusal outcomes achieved by specialist practitioners in Scotland were of a high standard. They maintained a good standard of clinical record collection in most areas examined.

摘要

目的

评估苏格兰专科诊疗中治疗的咬合结果及临床记录保存情况。

设计

一项回顾性队列研究。

背景

苏格兰的专科诊疗机构。

参与者

苏格兰的专科正畸医生。

方法

邀请了苏格兰的每位专科从业者(共51位)参与同行评审项目,38位(76%)报名参加。苏格兰被划分为四个地理区域,每位从业者与来自同一区域的一位同事配对。从业者花一天时间拜访其同事,并使用同行评估评分(PAR)指数对30例连续接受治疗的国民保健制度(NHS)病例进行评分。他们还评估了所记录内容的质量。然后从业者互换角色,评估其搭档的咬合结果和记录。

结果

治疗前PAR评分的平均值为28.6(标准差3.5)。治疗后PAR评分的平均值为3.5(标准差1.2)。PAR评分的平均降低值为25.1(标准差3.8)。PAR评分的平均降低百分比为87.7%(标准差3.7%)。总体记录保存评分情况为:书面记录100%,研究模型99.5%,曲面断层X光片99.2%,照片86.3%,病史75%,同意书40.8%。

结论

苏格兰专科从业者所取得的咬合结果达到了高标准。在大多数检查领域,他们保持了良好的临床记录收集标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验