Department of Anesthesia.
Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2019 Jul;31(3):299-305. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000514.
Anesthetic modality and hemodynamic management during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are potential contributors to the success of revascularization. The aims of our study were to review the hemodynamic management by anesthesiologists and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MT under conscious sedation.
Retrospective cohort study of patients with anterior circulation AIS from January 2012 to March 2016. Primary outcome was hemodynamic intervention, defined as administration of vasoactive drugs to maintain systolic blood pressure (BP) between 140 and 180 mm Hg. The secondary outcome was poor hemodynamic control, defined as BP outside target for >15 minutes despite hemodynamic intervention. We performed regression analysis to determine the predictors of hemodynamic intervention and poor hemodynamic control.
A total of 126 patients were included in this study; 92% (116) receiving conscious sedation and 8% (10) no sedation. Upon arrival to the neuroradiology suite, systolic BP was <140 mm Hg in 30.2% of the patients and >180 mm Hg in 14.3%. Hemodynamic intervention was required in 38.9% of patients; 15.1% for hypotension and 19.8% for hypertension. In the multivariate analysis, systolic BP on hospital admission (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.04; P=0.019) constituted a predictor for hemodynamic intervention. Poor hemodynamic control occurred in 12.7% of patients, with lower baseline systolic BP being associated with higher risk of intraprocedural hypotension (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.96; P<0.001). In-hospital mortality was 13.6%.
Hemodynamic intervention is frequent during MT under conscious sedation. The routine presence of anesthesiologists during MT may be helpful in maintaining hemodynamic stability and allow rapid treatment of emergent complications. An individualized approach with tailored hemodynamic targets is required during management of patients undergoing MT for AIS.
在急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)机械取栓术(MT)期间,麻醉方式和血流动力学管理可能是血管再通成功的潜在因素。我们的研究目的是回顾在清醒镇静下接受 MT 的患者的血流动力学管理和临床结局。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 3 月期间接受治疗的前循环 AIS 患者。主要结局是血管活性药物的使用以维持收缩压(BP)在 140-180mmHg 之间,定义为血流动力学干预。次要结局是血压未达标,定义为尽管进行了血流动力学干预,但血压仍超过目标值 15 分钟以上。我们进行了回归分析以确定血流动力学干预和血压未达标相关的预测因素。
共纳入 126 例患者,92%(116 例)接受清醒镇静,8%(10 例)未接受镇静。到达神经放射学套房时,30.2%的患者收缩压<140mmHg,14.3%的患者收缩压>180mmHg。需要进行血流动力学干预的患者占 38.9%,其中 15.1%为低血压,19.8%为高血压。多变量分析显示,入院时的收缩压(比值比,1.02;95%置信区间,1.00-1.04;P=0.019)是血流动力学干预的预测因素。12.7%的患者出现了血压未达标,基线收缩压越低,术中发生低血压的风险越高(比值比,0.92;95%置信区间,0.89-0.96;P<0.001)。住院死亡率为 13.6%。
在清醒镇静下进行 MT 时,经常需要进行血流动力学干预。在 MT 过程中常规配备麻醉医生可能有助于维持血流动力学稳定,并允许快速治疗紧急并发症。在管理接受 AIS 治疗的患者时,需要采用个体化的方法并设定个体化的血流动力学目标。