贯穿课程写作：标准化量表的信度测试。
Writing Across the Curriculum: Reliability Testing of a Standardized Rubric.
出版信息
J Nurs Educ. 2018 Jun 1;57(6):366-370. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20180522-08.
BACKGROUND
Rubrics positively affect student academic performance; however, accuracy and consistency of the rubric and its use is imperative. The researchers in this study developed a standardized rubric for use across an undergraduate nursing curriculum, then evaluated the interrater reliability and general usability of the tool.
METHOD
Faculty raters graded papers using the standardized rubric, submitted their independent scoring for interrater reliability analyses, then participated in a focus group discussion regarding rubric use experience.
RESULTS
Quantitative analysis of the data showed a high interrater reliability (α = .998). Content analysis of transcription revealed several positive themes: Consistency, Emphasis on Writing Ability, and Ability to Use the Rubric as a Teaching Tool. Areas for improvement included use of value words and difficulty with point allocation.
CONCLUSION
Investigators recommend effective faculty orientation for rubric use and future work in developing a rubric to assess reflective writing. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(6):366-370.].
背景
评分标准对学生的学习成绩有积极影响；然而，评分标准及其使用的准确性和一致性至关重要。本研究的研究人员为本科护理课程开发了一个标准化的评分标准，然后评估了该工具的评分者间信度和一般可用性。
方法
教师评分者使用标准化的评分标准对论文进行评分，提交他们的独立评分进行评分者间信度分析，然后参加了一个关于评分标准使用经验的焦点小组讨论。
结果
数据分析显示，评分者间信度很高（α=.998）。转录的内容分析揭示了几个积极的主题：一致性、对写作能力的重视和将评分标准用作教学工具的能力。需要改进的领域包括使用价值词和分配点的困难。
结论
研究人员建议对评分标准的使用进行有效的教师指导，并在开发评估反思性写作的评分标准方面开展进一步的工作。[J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(6):366-370.]。
Zotero 插件