• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注册护士到护理学学士项目中的一致性:标准化写作评估量表

Concordance Within an RN to BSN Program: Standardized Writing Assessment Rubrics.

作者信息

Abbott Miriam R B, Shaw Peggy

机构信息

About the Authors Miriam R. B. Abbott, MA, is an assistant professor, and Peggy Shaw, MSN/ED, RN, is an associate professor, Mount Carmel College of Nursing, Columbus, Ohio. For more information, contact Ms. Abbott at

出版信息

Nurs Educ Perspect. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):372-373. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000365.

DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000365
PMID:29994895
Abstract

A standardized rubric for writing assessment can improve concordance in expectations across a nurse educator community; however, standardization may also pose a perceived threat to faculty academic freedom. To improve assessment consistency while retaining academic freedom, an innovative rubric system that offers a compromise is proposed; it includes both standardized objective areas of assessment as well as areas of assessment for individualized instructor determination. In creating a hybrid standardized rubric, a community of nurse educators can retain academic freedom while better serving students with consistent expectations for writing skills.

摘要

用于写作评估的标准化评分标准可以提高护士教育工作者群体在期望方面的一致性;然而,标准化也可能给教师的学术自由带来一种可感知的威胁。为了在保持学术自由的同时提高评估的一致性,提出了一种创新的评分标准系统,它提供了一种折衷方案;该系统既包括标准化的客观评估领域,也包括由教师个性化决定的评估领域。在创建混合标准化评分标准时,护士教育工作者群体可以在保持学术自由的同时,以对写作技能的一致期望更好地服务学生。

相似文献

1
Concordance Within an RN to BSN Program: Standardized Writing Assessment Rubrics.注册护士到护理学学士项目中的一致性:标准化写作评估量表
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):372-373. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000365.
2
Writing Across the Curriculum: Reliability Testing of a Standardized Rubric.贯穿课程写作:标准化量表的信度测试。
J Nurs Educ. 2018 Jun 1;57(6):366-370. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20180522-08.
3
Implementing a writing course in an online RN-BSN program.在在线注册护士-本科护理课程中实施写作课程。
Nurse Educ. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):17-21. doi: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000437362.73347.5c.
4
Nursing Faculty Development: Building a Common Grading Rubric to Evaluate Writing.护理教师发展:构建用于评估写作的通用评分标准
Nurse Educ. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):222-4. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000268.
5
Professional writing in nursing education: creating an academic-community writing center.护理教育中的专业写作:创建学术-社区写作中心。
J Nurs Educ. 2013 Nov;52(11):615-20. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20131014-02. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
6
Righting writing: strategies for improving nursing student papers.纠正写作:提高护生论文质量的策略
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010;7:Article8. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1964. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
7
Teaching the literacy of professionalism: when clinical skills are not enough.教授专业素养:当临床技能还不够时。
Nurse Educ. 2012 May-Jun;37(3):121-5. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182504188.
8
RN-to-BSN education: Creating a Context that Uncovers New Possibilities.注册护士到护理学学士教育:营造一个发掘新机遇的环境。
J Nurs Educ. 2006 May;45(5):177-81. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20060501-07.
9
Writing exceptional (specific, student and criterion-focused) rubrics for nursing studies.编写护理研究的优秀(具体、学生和标准为重点)评分标准。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Nov;49:102851. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102851. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
10
Evaluating Scientific Writing Skill in DNP Program Students.评估护理实践博士项目学生的科研写作能力。
Nurse Educ. 2021;46(3):164-169. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000883.