• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同镇痛治疗方案用于全膝关节置换术的疗效比较:网状Meta 分析。

Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Analgesia Treatments for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Jianhu People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2018 Nov;34(11):1047-1060. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000631.

DOI:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000631
PMID:29864042
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The severe pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) brings many patients more suffering, longer hospital stay, and higher expenses. This study was designed to assess the relative efficacy of several clinical treatments for postoperative analgesia of TKA through network meta-analysis based on multiple published randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

Embase and PubMed were utilized to conduct this network meta-analysis from inception until 2016. Pain score, morphine consumption (milligrams), and length of hospitalization (day) were selected as the endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 58 studies with 3501 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Except for patient-controlled epidural analgesia+femoral nerve block (FNB) and sciatic nerve block, all treatments were significantly superior to placebo in pain score 6 to 8 hours. In terms of pain score 24 hours, only continuous femoral nerve block (cFNB), periarticular infiltration, periarticular infiltration+FNB, single-dose FNB, and sciatic nerve block+FNB exhibited better performance than control group. For pain score 48 hours after surgery, only cFNB and intra-articular infiltration yielded better results than control group [standard mean difference=-0.68, 95% credible intervals (CrIs)=-1.03 to -0.33; standard mean difference=-0.53, 95% CrIs=-1.07 to -0.01, respectively]. Only cFNB exhibited better results with respect to morphine consumption day 2 after surgery (mean difference=-12.95, 95% CrIs=-19.70 to -6.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering both pain score and morphine consumption, cFNB was potentially the most efficacious postoperative treatment for patients undergoing TKA.

摘要

背景与目的

全膝关节置换术后(TKA)的严重疼痛给许多患者带来了更多的痛苦、更长的住院时间和更高的费用。本研究旨在通过基于多个已发表的随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析来评估几种 TKA 术后镇痛临床治疗方法的相对疗效。

方法

从创建到 2016 年,我们在 Embase 和 PubMed 上进行了这项网络荟萃分析。疼痛评分、吗啡消耗量(毫克)和住院时间(天)被选为终点。

结果

共有 58 项研究,涉及 3501 例患者,被纳入本网络荟萃分析。除了患者自控硬膜外镇痛+股神经阻滞(FNB)和坐骨神经阻滞外,所有治疗方法在术后 6-8 小时的疼痛评分方面均明显优于安慰剂。在术后 24 小时的疼痛评分方面,只有连续股神经阻滞(cFNB)、关节周围浸润、关节周围浸润+FNB、单次 FNB 和坐骨神经阻滞+FNB 与对照组相比表现更好。在术后 48 小时的疼痛评分方面,只有 cFNB 和关节内浸润的结果优于对照组[标准均数差(SMD)=-0.68,95%可信区间(CrI)=-1.03 至-0.33;SMD=-0.53,95% CrI=-1.07 至-0.01]。只有 cFNB 在术后第 2 天的吗啡消耗量方面表现更好(平均差=-12.95,95% CrI=-19.70 至-6.53)。

结论

考虑到疼痛评分和吗啡消耗量,cFNB 可能是 TKA 术后最有效的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Analgesia Treatments for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-Analysis.不同镇痛治疗方案用于全膝关节置换术的疗效比较:网状Meta 分析。
Clin J Pain. 2018 Nov;34(11):1047-1060. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000631.
2
Femoral nerve blocks for acute postoperative pain after knee replacement surgery.膝关节置换术后急性疼痛的股神经阻滞
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 13;2014(5):CD009941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009941.pub2.
3
Comparison of continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB/SA) and continuous femoral nerve block with mini-dose spinal morphine (CFNB/SAMO) for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a randomized controlled study.全膝关节置换术(TKA)后连续股神经阻滞(CFNB/SA)与小剂量脊髓吗啡连续股神经阻滞(CFNB/SAMO)用于术后镇痛的比较:一项随机对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Jul 16;16(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0205-2.
4
The role of sciatic nerve block to complement femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.坐骨神经阻滞在全膝关节置换术中辅助股神经阻滞的作用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Anesth. 2018 Jun;32(3):341-350. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2480-1. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Is changing the postoperative pain management in total knee arthroplasty from femoral nerve block to local infiltration analgesia successful? Retrospective trial with the first and last 100 patients.将全膝关节置换术后疼痛管理从股神经阻滞改为局部浸润镇痛是否成功?对前后各100例患者进行的回顾性试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 19;15(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01981-3.
6
Comparison of local infiltration analgesia and sciatic nerve block as an adjunct to femoral nerve block for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全膝关节置换术后局部浸润镇痛与坐骨神经阻滞辅助股神经阻滞用于疼痛控制的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(19):e6829. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006829.
7
Comparison of Periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia With Femoral Nerve Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.膝关节置换术中外周关节局部浸润镇痛与股神经阻滞的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1972-1978.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.042. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
8
Effects of multi-site infiltration analgesia on pain management and early rehabilitation compared with femoral nerve or adductor canal block for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.全膝关节置换术患者多部位浸润镇痛与股神经或收肌管阻滞相比对疼痛管理和早期康复的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Int Orthop. 2017 Jan;41(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3278-0. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
9
Is sciatic nerve block advantageous when combined with femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty? a meta-analysis.坐骨神经阻滞与股神经阻滞联合用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛时是否具有优势?一项荟萃分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2016 May;63(5):552-68. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0613-2. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
10
Femoral nerve block-sciatic nerve block vs. femoral nerve block-local infiltration analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.全膝关节置换术中股神经阻滞联合坐骨神经阻滞与股神经阻滞联合局部浸润镇痛的比较:一项随机对照试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Dec 15;15:182. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0160-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of adding dexamethasone to adductor block and IPACK block on acute postoperative, rebound, and chronic pain following knee arthroplasty-1-year follow-up.在内收肌阻滞和IPACK阻滞中添加地塞米松对膝关节置换术后急性、反弹和慢性疼痛的影响——1年随访
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 29;12:1570795. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1570795. eCollection 2025.
2
Successful implementation of a quality improvement bundle to reduce opioid overprescribing following total hip and knee arthroplasty.成功实施质量改进措施包,以减少全髋关节和膝关节置换术后阿片类药物的过度处方。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Dec 26;12(4):e002360. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002360.
3
Evaluation of a New Method of Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective Pilot Study.
一种坐骨神经阻滞新方法的评估:一项前瞻性初步研究。
J Pain Res. 2023 Jun 16;16:2091-2099. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S404489. eCollection 2023.
4
Positioning the Catheter Tip Anterior or Posterior to the Saphenous Nerve in Continuous Adductor Canal Block: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study.隐神经连续收肌管阻滞中导管尖端置于隐神经前或后的效果:一项单中心回顾性比较研究
Local Reg Anesth. 2022 Dec 29;15:97-105. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S383601. eCollection 2022.
5
Efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen in multimodal management for pain relief following total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚在全膝关节置换术后多模式镇痛管理中的疗效:一项荟萃分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Oct 11;13(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0950-7.
6
Designing the ideal perioperative pain management plan starts with multimodal analgesia.设计理想的围手术期疼痛管理方案始于多模式镇痛。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Oct;71(5):345-352. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00217. Epub 2018 Aug 24.