Biodemography of Aging Research Unit, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(1):137-148. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180060.
Trends in the prevalence of cognitive impairment (CI) based on cognitive assessment instruments are often inconsistent with those of neurocognitive disorders (ND) based on Medicare claims records.
We hypothesized that improved ascertainment and resulting decrease in disease severity at the time of diagnosis are responsible for this phenomenon.
Using Medicare data linked to the Health and Retirement Study (1992-2012), we performed a joint analysis of trends in CI and ND to test our hypothesis.
We identified two major contributors to the divergent directions in CI and ND trends: reductions in disease severity explained more than 60% of the differences between CI and ND prevalence over the study period; the remaining 40% was explained by a decrease in the fraction of undiagnosed individuals.
Improvements in the diagnoses of ND diseases were a major contributor to reported trends in ND and CI. Recent forecasts of CI and ND trends in the U.S. may be overly pessimistic.
基于认知评估工具的认知障碍(CI)患病率趋势与基于医疗保险索赔记录的神经认知障碍(ND)患病率趋势往往不一致。
我们假设,在诊断时,更好的确定方法和由此导致的疾病严重程度降低是造成这种现象的原因。
我们使用与健康与退休研究(1992-2012 年)相关联的医疗保险数据,对 CI 和 ND 的趋势进行了联合分析,以检验我们的假设。
我们确定了导致 CI 和 ND 趋势方向不同的两个主要因素:在研究期间,疾病严重程度的降低解释了 CI 和 ND 患病率差异的 60%以上;剩下的 40%可以用未确诊个体比例的下降来解释。
ND 疾病诊断的改进是报告的 ND 和 CI 趋势的主要原因。美国最近对 CI 和 ND 趋势的预测可能过于悲观。