Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208;
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 19;115(25):6357-6362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720420115. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
Projections of future rates of mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet are highly uncertain because its sensitivity to warming is unclear. Geologic reconstructions of Quaternary interglacials can illustrate how the ice sheet responded during past warm periods, providing insights into ice sheet behavior and important tests for data-model comparisons. However, paleoclimate records from Greenland are limited: Early Holocene peak warmth has been quantified at only a few sites, and terrestrial sedimentary records of prior interglacials are exceptionally rare due to glacial erosion during the last glacial period. Here, we discuss findings from a lacustrine archive that records both the Holocene and the Last Interglacial (LIG) from Greenland, allowing for direct comparison between two interglacials. Sedimentary chironomid assemblages indicate peak July temperatures 4.0 to 7.0 °C warmer than modern during the Early Holocene maximum in summer insolation. and chironomids in LIG sediments indicate July temperatures at least 5.5 to 8.5 °C warmer than modern. These estimates indicate pronounced warming in northwest Greenland during both interglacials. This helps explain dramatic ice sheet thinning at Camp Century in northwest Greenland during the Early Holocene and, for the LIG, aligns with controversial estimates of Eemian warming from ice core data retrieved in northern Greenland. Converging geologic evidence for strong LIG warming is challenging to reconcile with inferred Greenland Ice Sheet extent during the LIG, and the two appear incompatible in many models of ice sheet evolution. An increase in LIG snowfall could help resolve this problem, pointing to the need for hydroclimate reconstructions from the region.
对格陵兰冰原未来质量损失率的预测存在很大的不确定性,因为其对变暖的敏感性尚不清楚。第四纪间冰期的地质重建可以说明冰原在过去温暖时期的响应情况,为了解冰原行为提供了线索,并为数据-模型比较提供了重要的检验。然而,格陵兰的古气候记录有限:只有少数几个地点量化了早全新世的峰值暖期,而且由于末次冰期的冰川侵蚀,先前间冰期的陆相沉积记录非常罕见。在这里,我们讨论了一个湖泊档案的发现,该档案记录了格陵兰的全新世和末次间冰期(LIG),可以对两个间冰期进行直接比较。沉积性摇蚊组合表明,在夏季太阳辐射最大值时,早全新世的 7 月温度比现代高 4.0 至 7.0°C。LIG 沉积物中的摇蚊表明,7 月的温度比现代至少高 5.5 至 8.5°C。这些估计表明,在两个间冰期内,格陵兰西北部都出现了明显的变暖。这有助于解释在全新世早期格陵兰岛西北部的世纪营(Camp Century)冰架的急剧变薄,并且对于 LIG 来说,与从格陵兰北部获取的冰芯数据中推断出的 Eemian 变暖的有争议估计相一致。地质证据表明 LIG 时期存在强烈的变暖,这与推断的 LIG 时期格陵兰冰盖的范围难以调和,在许多冰盖演化模型中,两者似乎不兼容。LIG 时期降雪量的增加可能有助于解决这个问题,这表明需要对该地区的水文气候进行重建。