Touro University California College of Pharmacy, Vallejo, California.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 May;82(4):6274. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6274.
To determine whether differences based on gender exist among pharmacy students involved in cases of admitted cheating or other academic dishonesty and to assess perceptions of academic dishonesty. Two cohorts of second-year male and female pharmacy students from four Northern California pharmacy programs were invited to complete a 45-item cross-sectional survey. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's chi-squared test were used for statistical analysis. There were 330 surveys completed with a 59% response rate. No significant gender-based differences were found regarding admitted cheating in pharmacy school and in regards to participating in various forms of academically dishonest behavior. Female students were more likely than male students to report witnessing a classmate copying another student's assignment. Male students were less likely than female students to perceive a student who distributed a stolen exam as a cheater. No gender-based differences were noted in cases of admitted cheating or with regards to taking part in various forms of academically dishonest behavior. However, female students report witnessing cheating more than male students, and male students may have a more lenient perception toward academically dishonest behavior than female students. The information gathered from this study may provide further insight to pharmacy programs and educators regarding academic dishonesty at their institution.
确定参与作弊或其他学术不端行为的药学专业学生是否存在基于性别的差异,并评估他们对学术不端行为的认知。方法:邀请来自加利福尼亚州北部四所药学专业的两个二年级男、女药学专业学生队列完成一份 45 项的横断面调查。采用描述性统计和 Pearson χ2 检验进行统计学分析。结果:共完成 330 份调查问卷,回应率为 59%。在药学专业作弊和参与各种形式的学术不端行为方面,未发现显著的性别差异。女学生比男学生更有可能报告看到同学抄袭另一名学生的作业。男学生比女学生更不容易将分发偷来的考卷的学生视为作弊者。在承认作弊或参与各种形式的学术不端行为方面,没有发现性别差异。然而,女学生比男学生更有可能目睹作弊行为,而男学生对学术不端行为的认知可能比女学生更宽容。从这项研究中收集的信息可能为药学专业学生和教育工作者提供关于其机构学术不端行为的进一步了解。