Freeman Michelle E, Murphy Brett P, Richards Anna E, Vesk Peter A, Cook Garry D
School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
CSIRO Land and Water, Tropical Ecosystems Research Centre, Winnellie, NT, Australia.
Front Plant Sci. 2018 May 18;9:644. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00644. eCollection 2018.
Fire is a major determinant of savanna tree communities and, as such, manipulation of fire frequency is an important management tool. Resolving the effects of fire management on tree size class distributions can help managers predict and plan for short-term ecological and economic outcomes, reveal different strategies by which woody plants cope with frequent fire, and help us predict vegetation changes under future fire scenarios. Savanna structure and size class distribution are strongly influenced by the ability of suppressed tree resprouts to escape stem death by frequent fire. A widespread assumption is that resprouts have an imperative to escape fire to reach sexual maturity in the canopy and thereby ensure long-term species viability. We use a census of Australian mesic savanna tree communities subjected to annual, triennial, and fire exclusion (unburnt) fire treatments to ask how fire frequency affects size class distributions within and between eco-taxonomic groups of species. Total tree densities did not significantly differ, but were highest in the triennial (7,610 ± se 1,162 trees ha) and unburnt fire treatments (7,051 ± se 578 trees ha) and lowest in the annual fire treatment (6,168 ± se 523 trees ha). This was caused by increased sapling densities in the triennial and unburnt fire treatments, predominantly of and pantropical genera. Eucalypts ( and spp.) dominated the canopy across all fire treatments indicating relatively greater success in recruiting to larger sizes than other species groups. However, in the sub-canopy size classes eucalypts co-dominated with, and in some size classes were outnumbered by, pantropicals and , regardless of fire treatment. We hypothesize that such results are caused by fundamental differences in woody plant strategies, in particular sexual reproduction, that have not been widely recognized in Australian savannas.
火灾是稀树草原树木群落的主要决定因素,因此,控制火灾频率是一项重要的管理工具。解决火灾管理对树木大小类分布的影响,有助于管理者预测和规划短期的生态和经济成果,揭示木本植物应对频繁火灾的不同策略,并帮助我们预测未来火灾情景下的植被变化。稀树草原的结构和大小类分布受到被抑制的树木萌蘖通过频繁火灾逃避茎死亡能力的强烈影响。一个普遍的假设是,萌蘖必须逃避火灾以在树冠层达到性成熟,从而确保物种的长期生存能力。我们对澳大利亚中生稀树草原树木群落进行了普查,这些群落接受了每年、每三年一次的火灾处理以及火灾排除(未燃烧)处理,以研究火灾频率如何影响物种生态分类组内部和之间的大小类分布。树木总密度没有显著差异,但在每三年一次的火灾处理(7610±标准误1162棵/公顷)和未燃烧处理(7051±标准误578棵/公顷)中最高,在每年一次的火灾处理(6168±标准误523棵/公顷)中最低。这是由于每三年一次的火灾处理和未燃烧处理中幼树密度增加,主要是某些属和泛热带属。在所有火灾处理中,桉属(和某些种)主导着树冠层,表明在招募到更大尺寸方面比其他物种组相对更成功。然而,在亚树冠层大小类中,无论火灾处理如何,桉属与泛热带属和某些属共同主导,在某些大小类中数量少于它们。我们假设这些结果是由木本植物策略的根本差异,特别是有性繁殖的差异造成的,而这些差异在澳大利亚稀树草原中尚未得到广泛认可。