• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

湿润稀树草原中的兼性和专性树木:火灾对稀树草原结构的影响意味着生态分类群的不同策略。

Facultative and Obligate Trees in a Mesic Savanna: Fire Effects on Savanna Structure Imply Contrasting Strategies of Eco-Taxonomic Groups.

作者信息

Freeman Michelle E, Murphy Brett P, Richards Anna E, Vesk Peter A, Cook Garry D

机构信息

School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

CSIRO Land and Water, Tropical Ecosystems Research Centre, Winnellie, NT, Australia.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2018 May 18;9:644. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00644. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2018.00644
PMID:29868096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5968114/
Abstract

Fire is a major determinant of savanna tree communities and, as such, manipulation of fire frequency is an important management tool. Resolving the effects of fire management on tree size class distributions can help managers predict and plan for short-term ecological and economic outcomes, reveal different strategies by which woody plants cope with frequent fire, and help us predict vegetation changes under future fire scenarios. Savanna structure and size class distribution are strongly influenced by the ability of suppressed tree resprouts to escape stem death by frequent fire. A widespread assumption is that resprouts have an imperative to escape fire to reach sexual maturity in the canopy and thereby ensure long-term species viability. We use a census of Australian mesic savanna tree communities subjected to annual, triennial, and fire exclusion (unburnt) fire treatments to ask how fire frequency affects size class distributions within and between eco-taxonomic groups of species. Total tree densities did not significantly differ, but were highest in the triennial (7,610 ± se 1,162 trees ha) and unburnt fire treatments (7,051 ± se 578 trees ha) and lowest in the annual fire treatment (6,168 ± se 523 trees ha). This was caused by increased sapling densities in the triennial and unburnt fire treatments, predominantly of and pantropical genera. Eucalypts ( and spp.) dominated the canopy across all fire treatments indicating relatively greater success in recruiting to larger sizes than other species groups. However, in the sub-canopy size classes eucalypts co-dominated with, and in some size classes were outnumbered by, pantropicals and , regardless of fire treatment. We hypothesize that such results are caused by fundamental differences in woody plant strategies, in particular sexual reproduction, that have not been widely recognized in Australian savannas.

摘要

火灾是稀树草原树木群落的主要决定因素,因此,控制火灾频率是一项重要的管理工具。解决火灾管理对树木大小类分布的影响,有助于管理者预测和规划短期的生态和经济成果,揭示木本植物应对频繁火灾的不同策略,并帮助我们预测未来火灾情景下的植被变化。稀树草原的结构和大小类分布受到被抑制的树木萌蘖通过频繁火灾逃避茎死亡能力的强烈影响。一个普遍的假设是,萌蘖必须逃避火灾以在树冠层达到性成熟,从而确保物种的长期生存能力。我们对澳大利亚中生稀树草原树木群落进行了普查,这些群落接受了每年、每三年一次的火灾处理以及火灾排除(未燃烧)处理,以研究火灾频率如何影响物种生态分类组内部和之间的大小类分布。树木总密度没有显著差异,但在每三年一次的火灾处理(7610±标准误1162棵/公顷)和未燃烧处理(7051±标准误578棵/公顷)中最高,在每年一次的火灾处理(6168±标准误523棵/公顷)中最低。这是由于每三年一次的火灾处理和未燃烧处理中幼树密度增加,主要是某些属和泛热带属。在所有火灾处理中,桉属(和某些种)主导着树冠层,表明在招募到更大尺寸方面比其他物种组相对更成功。然而,在亚树冠层大小类中,无论火灾处理如何,桉属与泛热带属和某些属共同主导,在某些大小类中数量少于它们。我们假设这些结果是由木本植物策略的根本差异,特别是有性繁殖的差异造成的,而这些差异在澳大利亚稀树草原中尚未得到广泛认可。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/3e64fbecdf02/fpls-09-00644-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/84519081acf1/fpls-09-00644-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/97c7f32f2a16/fpls-09-00644-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/0c90eb7f8cd7/fpls-09-00644-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/52bf7beb2542/fpls-09-00644-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/19f41c06aa0e/fpls-09-00644-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/967d79eaf69f/fpls-09-00644-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/4fb5cba0f66f/fpls-09-00644-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/ae609b86955e/fpls-09-00644-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/3e64fbecdf02/fpls-09-00644-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/84519081acf1/fpls-09-00644-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/97c7f32f2a16/fpls-09-00644-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/0c90eb7f8cd7/fpls-09-00644-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/52bf7beb2542/fpls-09-00644-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/19f41c06aa0e/fpls-09-00644-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/967d79eaf69f/fpls-09-00644-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/4fb5cba0f66f/fpls-09-00644-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/ae609b86955e/fpls-09-00644-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a63/5968114/3e64fbecdf02/fpls-09-00644-g0009.jpg

相似文献

1
Facultative and Obligate Trees in a Mesic Savanna: Fire Effects on Savanna Structure Imply Contrasting Strategies of Eco-Taxonomic Groups.湿润稀树草原中的兼性和专性树木:火灾对稀树草原结构的影响意味着生态分类群的不同策略。
Front Plant Sci. 2018 May 18;9:644. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00644. eCollection 2018.
2
Tree topkill, not mortality, governs the dynamics of savanna-forest boundaries under frequent fire in central Brazil.在巴西中部频繁火灾的情况下,树冠死亡而非树木死亡主导着稀树草原 - 森林边界的动态变化。
Ecology. 2009 May;90(5):1326-37. doi: 10.1890/08-0741.1.
3
Are the eucalypt and non-eucalypt components of Australian tropical savannas independent?澳大利亚热带稀树草原的桉树和非桉树成分是否相互独立?
Oecologia. 2011 May;166(1):229-39. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1829-4. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
4
Managing the matrix: decadal responses of eucalypt-dominated savanna to ambient fire regimes.管理矩阵:桉树主导的稀树草原对环境火灾制度的十年响应。
Ecol Appl. 2010 Sep;20(6):1615-32. doi: 10.1890/09-1553.1.
5
Fire controls population structure in four dominant tree species in a tropical savanna.火灾控制着热带稀树草原四种主要树种的种群结构。
Oecologia. 2009 Sep;161(3):505-15. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1395-9. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
6
Seasonal leaf dynamics across a tree density gradient in a Brazilian savanna.巴西稀树草原中树木密度梯度上的季节性叶片动态
Oecologia. 2005 Sep;145(2):307-16. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0129-x. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
7
Effects of four decades of fire manipulation on woody vegetation structure in Savanna.四十年火烧处理对稀树草原木本植被结构的影响。
Ecology. 2007 May;88(5):1119-25. doi: 10.1890/06-1664.
8
Effects of fire on woody vegetation structure in African savanna.火对非洲热带稀树草原木本植被结构的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2010 Oct;20(7):1865-75. doi: 10.1890/09-0929.1.
9
Tree cover in sub-Saharan Africa: rainfall and fire constrain forest and savanna as alternative stable states.撒哈拉以南非洲的树木覆盖:降雨和火灾限制了森林和稀树草原作为替代稳定状态。
Ecology. 2011 May;92(5):1063-72. doi: 10.1890/10-1684.1.
10
Ecological thresholds at the savanna-forest boundary: how plant traits, resources and fire govern the distribution of tropical biomes.热带稀树草原-森林边界的生态阈值:植物特性、资源和火如何控制热带生物群落的分布。
Ecol Lett. 2012 Jul;15(7):759-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01789.x. Epub 2012 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Does rapid utilization of elevated nutrient availability allow eucalypts to dominate in the tropical savannas of Australia?对养分有效性提高的快速利用是否使桉树在澳大利亚热带稀树草原占主导地位?
Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr 7;10(9):4021-4030. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6168. eCollection 2020 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Feral Cats Are Better Killers in Open Habitats, Revealed by Animal-Borne Video.动物携带的视频揭示:野猫在开阔栖息地是更出色的猎手。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0133915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133915. eCollection 2015.
2
Caught in a fire trap: recurring fire creates stable size equilibria in woody resprouters.陷入火陷阱:复燃火灾在木本再生植物中创造稳定的大小平衡。
Ecology. 2012 Sep;93(9):2052-60. doi: 10.1890/12-0354.1.
3
What controls the distribution of tropical forest and savanna?什么控制着热带森林和热带稀树草原的分布?
Ecol Lett. 2012 Jul;15(7):748-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01771.x. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
4
The global extent and determinants of savanna and forest as alternative biome states.热带稀树草原和森林作为替代生物群落状态的全球范围和决定因素。
Science. 2011 Oct 14;334(6053):230-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1210465.
5
The effect of carbon credits on savanna land management and priorities for biodiversity conservation.碳信用额对热带稀树草原土地管理的影响及生物多样性保护的重点。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023843. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
6
Deciphering the distribution of the savanna biome.解析热带草原生物群系的分布。
New Phytol. 2011 Jul;191(1):197-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03689.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
7
Are the eucalypt and non-eucalypt components of Australian tropical savannas independent?澳大利亚热带稀树草原的桉树和非桉树成分是否相互独立?
Oecologia. 2011 May;166(1):229-39. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1829-4. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
8
Effects of fire on woody vegetation structure in African savanna.火对非洲热带稀树草原木本植被结构的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2010 Oct;20(7):1865-75. doi: 10.1890/09-0929.1.
9
Fire controls population structure in four dominant tree species in a tropical savanna.火灾控制着热带稀树草原四种主要树种的种群结构。
Oecologia. 2009 Sep;161(3):505-15. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1395-9. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
10
Effects of four decades of fire manipulation on woody vegetation structure in Savanna.四十年火烧处理对稀树草原木本植被结构的影响。
Ecology. 2007 May;88(5):1119-25. doi: 10.1890/06-1664.