Baumann Rene, Chan Mark K H, Pyschny Florian, Stera Susanne, Malzkuhn Bettina, Wurster Stefan, Huttenlocher Stefan, Szücs Marcella, Imhoff Detlef, Keller Christian, Balermpas Panagiotis, Rades Dirk, Rödel Claus, Dunst Jürgen, Hildebrandt Guido, Blanck Oliver
Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt und Norddeutschland, Güstrow, Germany.
Front Oncol. 2018 May 17;8:171. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00171. eCollection 2018.
We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of gross tumor volume (GTV) mean dose optimized stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for primary and secondary lung tumors with and without robotic real-time motion compensation.
Between 2011 and 2017, 208 patients were treated with SBRT for 111 primary lung tumors and 163 lung metastases with a median GTV of 8.2 cc (0.3-174.0 cc). Monte Carlo dose optimization was performed prioritizing GTV mean dose at the potential cost of planning target volume (PTV) coverage reduction while adhering to safe normal tissue constraints. The median GTV mean biological effective dose (BED) was 162.0 Gy (34.2-253.6 Gy) and the prescribed PTV BED ranged 23.6-151.2 Gy (median, 100.8 Gy). Motion compensation was realized through direct tracking (44.9%), fiducial tracking (4.4%), and internal target volume (ITV) concepts with small (≤5 mm, 33.2%) or large (>5 mm, 17.5%) motion. The local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.
Median follow-up was 14.5 months (1-72 months). The 2-year actuarial LC, PFS, and OS rates were 93.1, 43.2, and 62.4%, and the median PFS and OS were 18.0 and 39.8 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, prior local irradiation (hazard ratio (HR) 0.18, confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.63, = 0.01), GTV/PTV (HR 1.01-1.02, CI 1.01-1.04, < 0.02), and PTV prescription, mean GTV, and maximum plan BED (HR 0.97-0.99, CI 0.96-0.99, < 0.01) were predictive for LC while the tracking method was not ( = 0.97). For PFS and OS, multivariate analysis showed Karnofsky Index ( < 0.01) and tumor stage ( ≤ 0.02) to be significant factors for outcome prediction. Late radiation pneumonitis or chronic rip fractures grade 1-2 were observed in 5.3% of the patients. Grade ≥3 side effects did not occur.
Robotic SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for lung tumors. Reducing the PTV prescription and keeping high GTV mean doses allowed the reduction of toxicity while maintaining high local tumor control. The use of real-time motion compensation is strongly advised, however, well-performed ITV motion compensation may be used alternatively when direct tracking is not feasible.
我们回顾性评估了在有和没有机器人实时运动补偿的情况下,大体肿瘤体积(GTV)平均剂量优化的立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)对原发性和继发性肺肿瘤的疗效和毒性。
2011年至2017年间,208例患者接受了SBRT治疗,其中111例为原发性肺肿瘤,163例为肺转移瘤,GTV中位数为8.2 cc(0.3 - 174.0 cc)。进行了蒙特卡洛剂量优化,以GTV平均剂量为优先考虑因素,可能以减少计划靶体积(PTV)覆盖范围为代价,同时遵守安全的正常组织限制。GTV平均生物等效剂量(BED)中位数为162.0 Gy(34.2 - 253.6 Gy),规定的PTV BED范围为23.6 - 151.2 Gy(中位数,100.8 Gy)。通过直接跟踪(44.9%)、基准跟踪(4.4%)以及内部靶体积(ITV)概念实现运动补偿,运动幅度小(≤5 mm,33.2%)或大(>5 mm,17.5%)。分析了局部控制(LC)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和毒性。
中位随访时间为14.5个月(1 - 72个月)。2年精算LC、PFS和OS率分别为93.1%、43.2%和62.4%,中位PFS和OS分别为18.0个月和39.个月。在单因素分析中,既往局部照射(风险比(HR)0.18,置信区间(CI)0.05 - 0.63,P = 0.01)、GTV/PTV(HR 1.01 - 1.02,CI 1.01 - 1.04,P < 0.02)以及PTV处方、GTV均值和最大计划BED(HR 0.97 - 0.99,CI 0.96 - 0.99,P < 0.01)对LC有预测作用,而跟踪方法无此作用(P = 0.97)。对于PFS和OS,多因素分析显示卡诺夫斯基指数(P < 0.01)和肿瘤分期(P ≤ 0.02)是结果预测的重要因素。5.3%的患者出现了1 - 2级晚期放射性肺炎或慢性肋骨骨折。未发生≥3级副作用。
机器人SBRT是治疗肺肿瘤的一种安全有效的方法。降低PTV处方并保持较高的GTV平均剂量可在维持高局部肿瘤控制的同时降低毒性。强烈建议使用实时运动补偿,然而,当直接跟踪不可行时,也可选择执行良好的ITV运动补偿。