• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为混合辐射生物剂量测定迭代方法发展的分析方法和准贝叶斯方法。

Analytical and quasi-Bayesian methods as development of the iterative approach for mixed radiation biodosimetry.

作者信息

Słonecka Iwona, Łukasik Krzysztof, Fornalski Krzysztof W

机构信息

Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, Konwaliowa 7, 03-194, Warszawa, Poland.

Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University of Technology, Warszawa, Poland.

出版信息

Radiat Environ Biophys. 2018 Aug;57(3):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s00411-018-0745-6. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00411-018-0745-6
PMID:29869092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6060769/
Abstract

The present paper proposes two methods of calculating components of the dose absorbed by the human body after exposure to a mixed neutron and gamma radiation field. The article presents a novel approach to replace the common iterative method in its analytical form, thus reducing the calculation time. It also shows a possibility of estimating the neutron and gamma doses when their ratio in a mixed beam is not precisely known.

摘要

本文提出了两种计算人体在暴露于混合中子和伽马辐射场后吸收剂量分量的方法。文章提出了一种新颖的方法，以其解析形式取代常用的迭代方法，从而减少计算时间。文章还表明，当混合束中中子和伽马剂量的比例不太精确已知时，有可能估算出中子和伽马剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eeb/6060769/04b4f2fc5b8e/411_2018_745_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eeb/6060769/b63643ded640/411_2018_745_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eeb/6060769/80d8290ea954/411_2018_745_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eeb/6060769/e01c347ea013/411_2018_745_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eeb/6060769/04b4f2fc5b8e/411_2018_745_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eeb/6060769/b63643ded640/411_2018_745_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eeb/6060769/80d8290ea954/411_2018_745_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eeb/6060769/e01c347ea013/411_2018_745_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eeb/6060769/04b4f2fc5b8e/411_2018_745_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Analytical and quasi-Bayesian methods as development of the iterative approach for mixed radiation biodosimetry.作为混合辐射生物剂量测定迭代方法发展的分析方法和准贝叶斯方法。
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2018 Aug;57(3):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s00411-018-0745-6. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
2
Neutron Radiobiology and Dosimetry.中子放射生物学与剂量测定法
Radiat Res. 2021 May 1;195(5):480-496. doi: 10.1667/RADE-20-00213.1.
3
Bayesian methods for chromosome dosimetry following a criticality accident.临界事故后染色体剂量测定的贝叶斯方法。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2003;104(1):61-3. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006165.
4
Simplified Bayesian method: application in cytogenetic biological dosimetry of mixed n + γ radiation fields.简化贝叶斯方法：在混合中子+γ辐射场细胞遗传学生物剂量测定中的应用
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2019 Mar;58(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00411-018-0764-3. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
5
Comparison of Biodosimetry Biomarkers for Radiation Dose and Injury Assessment After Mixed-Field (Neutron and Gamma) and Pure Gamma Radiation in the Mouse Total-Body Irradiation Model.小鼠全身照射模型中混合场（中子和γ射线）及纯γ射线辐射后用于辐射剂量和损伤评估的生物剂量测定生物标志物的比较
Health Phys. 2018 Dec;115(6):743-759. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000939.
6
Biomarkers for Radiation Biodosimetry and Injury Assessment after Mixed-field (Neutron and Gamma) Radiation in the Mouse Total-body Irradiation Model.小鼠全身照射模型中混合场（中子和γ射线）辐射后辐射生物剂量测定和损伤评估的生物标志物
Health Phys. 2018 Dec;115(6):727-742. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000938.
7
Neutron field produced by 25 MeV deuteron on thick beryllium for radiobiological study; energy spectrum.用于放射生物学研究的25兆电子伏氘核在厚铍靶上产生的中子场；能谱
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;110(1-4):601-6. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch142.
8
DISCRIMINATION METHOD FOR GAMMA RAY DOSES IN NEUTRON FIELDS USING AN IONIZATION CHAMBER WITH ATTENUATION FILTERS.使用带有衰减滤波器的电离室对中子场中伽马射线剂量的鉴别方法
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2019 May 1;183(1-2):280-284. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncz002.
9
Retrospective dosimetry after criticality accidents using low-frequency EPR: a study of whole human teeth irradiated in a mixed neutron and gamma-radiation field.利用低频电子顺磁共振进行临界事故后的回顾性剂量测定：对在混合中子和γ辐射场中辐照的完整人类牙齿的研究
Radiat Res. 2003 Aug;160(2):168-73. doi: 10.1667/rr3026.
10
Accounting for neutron exposure in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors.日本原子弹幸存者的中子暴露情况核算。
Radiat Res. 2014 Dec;182(6):587-98. doi: 10.1667/RR13663.1.

引用本文的文献

1
The radiation adaptive response and priming dose influence: the quantification of the Raper-Yonezawa effect and its three-parameter model for postradiation DNA lesions and mutations.辐射适应反应和预剂量影响：对 Raper-Yonezawa 效应及其用于辐射后 DNA 损伤和突变的三参数模型的定量研究。
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2022 May;61(2):221-239. doi: 10.1007/s00411-022-00963-9. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
2
Simplified Bayesian method: application in cytogenetic biological dosimetry of mixed n + γ radiation fields.简化贝叶斯方法：在混合中子+γ辐射场细胞遗传学生物剂量测定中的应用
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2019 Mar;58(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00411-018-0764-3. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of Bayesian statistical analysis methods for cytogenetic radiation biodosimetry, with a practical example.细胞遗传辐射生物剂量测定的贝叶斯统计分析方法综述及实例分析
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2014 Dec;162(3):185-96. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nct301. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
2
CytoBayesJ: software tools for Bayesian analysis of cytogenetic radiation dosimetry data.CytoBayesJ：用于细胞遗传学辐射剂量学数据分析的贝叶斯分析软件工具。
Mutat Res. 2013 Aug 30;756(1-2):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
3
A generalized formulation of dual radiation action.
双辐射作用的广义公式。
Radiat Res. 2012 Aug;178(2):AV204-13. doi: 10.1667/rrav17.1.
4
Criticality accident dosimetry by chromosomal analysis.通过染色体分析进行临界事故剂量测定。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;110(1-4):443-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch226.
5
Bayesian methods for chromosome dosimetry following a criticality accident.临界事故后染色体剂量测定的贝叶斯方法。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2003;104(1):61-3. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006165.