Suppr超能文献

马斯拉赫职业倦怠量表和自我定义的单项倦怠测量产生了不同的临床医生和员工倦怠估计。

Maslach Burnout Inventory and a Self-Defined, Single-Item Burnout Measure Produce Different Clinician and Staff Burnout Estimates.

机构信息

Center for Excellence in Primary Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1344-1351. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4507-6. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians and healthcare staff report high levels of burnout. Two common burnout assessments are the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and a single-item, self-defined burnout measure. Relatively little is known about how the measures compare.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the sensitivity, specificity, and concurrent validity of the self-defined burnout measure compared to the more established MBI measure.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey (November 2016-January 2017).

PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred forty-four primary care clinicians and 606 staff from three San Francisco Aarea healthcare systems.

MAIN MEASURES

The MBI measure, calculated from a high score on either the emotional exhaustion or cynicism subscale, and a single-item measure of self-defined burnout. Concurrent validity was assessed using a validated, 7-item team culture scale as reported by Willard-Grace et al. (J Am Board Fam Med 27(2):229-38, 2014) and a standard question about workplace atmosphere as reported by Rassolian et al. (JAMA Intern Med 177(7):1036-8, 2017) and Linzer et al. (Ann Intern Med 151(1):28-36, 2009).

KEY RESULTS

Similar to other nationally representative burnout estimates, 52% of clinicians (95% CI: 47-57%) and 46% of staff (95% CI: 42-50%) reported high MBI emotional exhaustion or high MBI cynicism. In contrast, 29% of clinicians (95% CI: 25-33%) and 31% of staff (95% CI: 28-35%) reported "definitely burning out" or more severe symptoms on the self-defined burnout measure. The self-defined measure's sensitivity to correctly identify MBI-assessed burnout was 50.4% for clinicians and 58.6% for staff; specificity was 94.7% for clinicians and 92.3% for staff. Area under the receiver operator curve was 0.82 for clinicians and 0.81 for staff. Team culture and atmosphere were significantly associated with both self-defined burnout and the MBI, confirming concurrent validity.

CONCLUSIONS

Point estimates of burnout notably differ between the self-defined and MBI measures. Compared to the MBI, the self-defined burnout measure misses half of high-burnout clinicians and more than 40% of high-burnout staff. The self-defined burnout measure has a low response burden, is free to administer, and yields similar associations across two burnout predictors from prior studies. However, the self-defined burnout and MBI measures are not interchangeable.

摘要

背景

临床医生和医疗保健人员报告称,他们的倦怠程度很高。两种常见的倦怠评估方法是马斯拉赫倦怠量表(MBI)和单一项目、自我定义的倦怠衡量标准。相对而言,人们对这些衡量标准的比较知之甚少。

目的

确定自我定义的倦怠衡量标准与更成熟的 MBI 衡量标准相比的敏感性、特异性和同时效度。

设计

横断面调查(2016 年 11 月至 2017 年 1 月)。

参与者

来自旧金山三个医疗系统的 444 名初级保健临床医生和 606 名工作人员。

主要措施

MBI 衡量标准,根据情绪衰竭或玩世不恭子量表的高分计算得出,以及自我定义的倦怠单一衡量标准。同时效度通过使用Willard-Grace 等人(J Am Board Fam Med 27(2):229-38, 2014)报告的经过验证的 7 项团队文化量表和 Rassolian 等人(JAMA Intern Med 177(7):1036-8, 2017)和 Linzer 等人(Ann Intern Med 151(1):28-36, 2009)报告的关于工作场所氛围的标准问题进行评估。

主要结果

与其他具有全国代表性的倦怠估计相似,52%的临床医生(95%CI:47-57%)和 46%的工作人员(95%CI:42-50%)报告 MBI 情绪衰竭或 MBI 玩世不恭较高。相比之下,29%的临床医生(95%CI:25-33%)和 31%的工作人员(95%CI:28-35%)报告“肯定精疲力竭”或自我定义的倦怠衡量标准更严重的症状。自我定义的衡量标准对正确识别 MBI 评估的倦怠的敏感性为 50.4%的临床医生和 58.6%的工作人员;特异性为 94.7%的临床医生和 92.3%的工作人员。临床医生和工作人员的接收者操作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.82 和 0.81。团队文化和氛围与自我定义的倦怠和 MBI 均显著相关,证实了同时效度。

结论

自我定义和 MBI 衡量标准之间的倦怠点估计差异显著。与 MBI 相比,自我定义的倦怠衡量标准错过了一半的高倦怠临床医生和超过 40%的高倦怠工作人员。自我定义的倦怠衡量标准负担较低,免费管理,并在两项来自先前研究的倦怠预测因素中产生相似的关联。然而,自我定义的倦怠和 MBI 衡量标准不可互换。

相似文献

8
A Survey of Burnout Among Neurocritical Care Practitioners.神经危重症护理从业者的倦怠情况调查。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Feb;40(1):328-336. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01750-0. Epub 2023 May 26.
10
[A meta-analysis of job burnout using the MBI scale].[一项使用MBI量表对职业倦怠的荟萃分析]
Encephale. 2007 Dec;33(6):947-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2006.10.001. Epub 2007 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

7
The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Resident Education and Burnout.新冠疫情对住院医师教育及职业倦怠的影响。
HCA Healthc J Med. 2024 Jun 1;5(3):297-301. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1646. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The Problems With Burnout Research. burnout 研究中的问题。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):367-370. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001890.
2
Workplace Factors Associated With Burnout of Family Physicians.与家庭医生倦怠相关的工作场所因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):1036-1038. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1391.
3
Prevalence of Burnout in Board Certified Family Physicians.获得委员会认证的家庭医生职业倦怠的患病率。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Mar-Apr;30(2):125-126. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160295.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验