• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Conceptual Factors Influence Children's Distributivity Bias.

作者信息

Patson Nikole D, Hupp Julie M

机构信息

a The Ohio State University.

出版信息

J Gen Psychol. 2018 Jul-Sep;145(3):225-237. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2018.1464432. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1080/00221309.2018.1464432
PMID:29869952
Abstract

Sentences such as "The girls read a book" can lead to multiple interpretations: They could be reading the same book (collective) or they could each be reading their own book (distributive). In ambiguous contexts, adults prefer the collective interpretation, and preschool children show a slight bias for a distributive interpretation. The current research investigated whether conceptual factors (number of actors) influences interpretations of these kinds of predicates. The data with children show a stronger collective bias when there are four actors compared to two actors. This may be because children are more likely to conceptualize groups of four (vs. two) as sets rather than collections of individuals. These data are discussed with reference to research on visual and conceptual integration abilities, showing that children lag behind in their ability to combine components into a whole in comparison to parsing objects into their component parts.

摘要

相似文献

1
Conceptual Factors Influence Children's Distributivity Bias.
J Gen Psychol. 2018 Jul-Sep;145(3):225-237. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2018.1464432. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
2
Revealing abstract semantic mechanisms through priming: The distributive/collective contrast.通过启动揭示抽象语义机制:分布/集合对比。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:171-176. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
3
Who is the agent? The influence of pragmatic leads on children's reference assignment in non-obligatory control.
J Child Lang. 2018 Mar;45(2):442-478. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000320. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
4
Syntactic cues in the acquisition of collective nouns.集体名词习得中的句法线索。
Cognition. 1995 Jul;56(1):1-30. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00648-5.
5
Children's comprehension of plural predicate conjunction.
J Child Lang. 2018 Jan;45(1):242-259. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000137. Epub 2017 May 8.
6
Collectivity, Distributivity, and the Interpretation of Plural Numerical Expressions in Child and Adult Language.集体性、分配性以及儿童和成人语言中复数数字表达式的解释
Lang Acquis. 2013;20(4). doi: 10.1080/10489223.2013.828060.
7
On-line processing of English which-questions by children and adults: a visual world paradigm study.儿童和成人对英语特殊疑问句的在线处理:一项视觉世界范式研究。
J Child Lang. 2018 Mar;45(2):415-441. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000277. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
8
Child-Like Adults: Dual-Task Effects on Collective vs. Distributive Sentence Interpretations.类儿童成年人:双重任务对集体与分配性句子解释的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 10;12:556120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.556120. eCollection 2021.
9
Conceptual perspective-taking and children's interpretation of pronouns in reported speech.
J Child Lang. 1995 Feb;22(1):171-87. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900009685.
10
The count-mass distinction in typically developing and grammatically specifically language impaired children: new evidence on the role of syntax and semantics.正常发育儿童与语法特定性语言障碍儿童的数量-质量区分:关于句法和语义作用的新证据
J Commun Disord. 2008 May-Jun;41(3):274-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Dec 4.